Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:52:42.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chile-United States Commission Convened Under the 1914 Treaty for the Settlement of Disputes: Decision with Regard to the Dispute Concerning Responsibility for the Deaths of Letelier and Moffitt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[ Reproduced from the text provided By the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The agreement deciding that the Commission would determine the amount of compensation due, done at Santiago, June 11, 1990, appears at 30 I.L.M. 412 (1991); the agreement is also reproduced in the text of this decision.

[The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Memorandum Opinion addressing jurisdictional issues in the suit brought by the families of Letelier and Moffitt against Chile appears at 19 I.L.M. 409 (1980); a later Memorandum Opinion by the same court, at 19 I.L.M. 1418 (1980), sets forth amounts the plaintiffs were entitled to in judgments by default.]

References

* [ Reproduced from the text provided By the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The agreement deciding that the Commission would determine the amount of compensation due, done at Santiago, June 11, 1990, appears at 30 I.L.M. 412 (1991); the agreement is also reproduced in the text of this decision.

[The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Memorandum Opinion addressing jurisdictional issues in the suit brought by the families of Letelier and Moffitt against Chile appears at 19 I.L.M. 409 (1980); a later Memorandum Opinion by the same court, at 19 I.L.M. 1418 (1980), sets forth amounts the plaintiffs were entitled to in judgments by default.]