Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:12:51.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States (No 2)

ENAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration Tribunal (ICSID Additional Facility Rules).  26 September 2001 ; 26 June 2002 ; 30 April 2004 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Place of arbitration — Relevant factors — Neutrality of forum — Applicability of New York (1958) or Panama (1975) Conventions — Differences between two Conventions — Positions taken by Government of Canada in earlier proceedings — Whether relevant — Convenience of parties and counsel — NAFTA Articles 1122, 1130 — ICSID Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules, Articles 20, 21

Arbitration — Jurisdiction — Successive arbitrations on the same claim — NAFTA, Chapter 11 — First arbitration commenced without valid waiver under Article 1121(2)(b) — First tribunal deciding that it lacked jurisdiction — Whether new proceedings permissible — NAFTA Articles 1120, 1121

Arbitration — Principles — Res judicata — Decision of first tribunal denying jurisdiction over claim — Whether precluding new arbitration on same claim — Interpretation of first tribunal’s decision — NAFTA Article 1136 — ICSID (Additional Facility) Rules, Article 53(4)

Arbitration — Procedure — Abuse of process — Successive proceedings relating to same claim — Whether Tribunal has inherent power to stay proceedings — No evidence of lack of bona fides — Second arbitration allowed to proceed

Arbitration — Procedure — Costs and expenses — Unsuccessful jurisdictional objection — Whether respondent should be required to pay costs and expenses in any event — Extent of Tribunal’s discretion — Dismissal of claim on the merits

Economics, trade and finance — International investment — Protection of investments — NAFTA Chapter 11 — Investor — Status of investor — Claimant owning or controlling investment in a holding company registered in a non-NAFTA State — Whether claimant possessing status of investor under NAFTA

Economics, trade and finance — International investment — Standard of treatment — Minimum standard — Fair and equitable treatment — NAFTA Article 1105 — Standard of review — Breach of contract — Whether reaching level of prohibited treatment — Effect of financial crisis on respondent State

Expropriation — Direct and indirect expropriation — Non-performance of a contractual obligation — Whether amounting to expropriation — NAFTA Article 1110

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)