Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:50:18.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Suárez-Rosero v. Ecuador

Inter-American Court of Human Rights.  12 November 1997 ; 20 January 1999 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Treaties — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969 — Right to personal liberty — Right to a fair trial — Right to humane treatment — Right to judicial protection — Whether Ecuador violating Articles 7, 8, 5 and 25 of Convention — Whether Ecuador acting in violation of its domestic laws — Whether urgent measures necessary to protect physical and moral integrity of victim and his family

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969 — Ecuador State Party to Convention — Article 1 of Convention obliging Ecuador to respect rights in Convention — Whether Ecuador breaching Article 2 of Convention in failing to give domestic legal effect to Convention rights — Ecuadorean municipal laws — Ecuadorean Political Constitution — Ecuadorean Criminal Code — Ecuadorean Law on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances — Article 114 bis of Criminal Code disapplying its provisions to persons charged under Law on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances — Whether violating Article 2 of Convention

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Reparations — Applicable law — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969, Article 63(1) — International law governing scope, nature, modality and determination of beneficiaries of reparations — Whether subject to alteration by municipal law — Whether new Ecuadorean law constituting appropriate measure to fulfil judgment on the Merits

International tribunals — Role of Inter-American Court of Human Rights — Ecuador requesting dismissal of petition — Seriousness of crime of drug-trafficking — Whether impairing peace and security of State and health of its population — Admissibility of request — Inter-American Court of Human Rights not usurping role of domestic courts — Ecuador's criminal tribunals to decide on individual's responsibility for crimes — Innocence or guilt of victim unrelated to merits of present case — Whether Ecuador having international responsibility for violations of Convention — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969

State responsibility — Imputability — Human rights violation — Whether State responsible — Whether unlawful act imputable to State — Whether State having duty to make reparations

Damages — For human rights violations — Whether Ecuador having duty to make proper reparation — Entitlement to fair compensation — Compensatory damages — Pecuniary damages — Moral damages — Whether apology from Ecuador necessary — Ecuador having duty to repair consequences of violations — Costs and expenses — Mode of compliance — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969, Article 63(1)

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)