Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:14:35.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SPP (Middle East) Limited and Southern Pacific Properties Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt And Egyptian General Company for Tourism and Hotels

International Chamber of Commerce, Court of Arbitration.  11 March 1983 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Agreement to arbitrate — Parties to agreement — Whether State becoming party to agreement countersigned by minister — Negotiating history of agreement — Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal — Competence of tribunal to determine own jurisdiction — Procedure — Arbitrator refusing to sign award — Costs — ICC arbitration

Damages — Measure of damages — Breach of State contract — Valuation — Damnum emergensLucrum cessans — Loss which could be foreseen at date of contract — Methods of assessment — Discounted cash flow — Value of investment and incremental increases

Economics, trade and finance — State contracts — Contract between State-owned entity and foreign company — Whether binding upon State — Contract countersigned by minister — Proper law of contract — Contract subject to local law — Whether local law deemed to include principles of international law — Pacta sunt servanda — Principle of just compensation for expropriation — ICSID Convention — Whether ratification of Convention by State indicates intention to abide by certain international law principles — Force majeure — Whether State-owned company under control of State may invoke force majeure clause — Damages for breach of contract — Measure of damages

Expropriation — Contractual limitations upon State’s powers of expropriation — Compensation — Valuation of investment

State immunity — Waiver — Agreement to arbitrate — Whether State’s agreement to international arbitration amounts to waiver of immunity — State contract providing for ICC arbitration

State responsibility — For breaches of contract — Contract concluded by State-owned entity — Countersignature of minister — Whether State a party to contract

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)