Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:49:50.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain et al.

United States of America.  03 June 2003 ; 29 June 2004 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Jurisdiction — Executive — Executive’s powers to carry out law enforcement operations abroad — Whether political branches having power to override principles of territorial sovereignty — Transborder abduction — United States agents kidnapping Mexican national Alvarez in Mexico and transporting to United States to stand trial — Whether United States agents having authority to make warrantless arrest outside United States borders — Whether giving rise to claims under Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) and Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”)

Claims — Claims for damages for tort of false arrest and arbitrary arrest and detention in violation of law of nations — Alvarez making claims under Federal Tort Claims Act and Alien Tort Statute — Scope of FTCA and ATS — Whether United States liable to Alvarez for damages under FTCA for tort of false arrest — Whether Mexican kidnapper Sosa liable to Alvarez for damages under ATS for violation of law of nations — Whether damages payable to Alvarez under United States law

State immunity — Federal Tort Claims Act — Scope — Whether United States liable for tort of false arrest under FTCA — Waiver of sovereign immunity in Section 1346(b)(1) of FTCA — Limits to waiver of sovereign immunity — Whether “foreign activities” exception in Section 2680(k) of FTCA applicable — “Headquarters doctrine” — Whether applicable — Whether “international tort” exception in Section 2680(h) applicable

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Alien Tort Statute — Scope — Whether Mexican kidnapper Sosa liable to Alvarez for damages under ATS — Section 1350 of ATS — Whether violation of law of nations — Whether ATS creating new causes of action — Whether federal courts precluded from recognizing claim under law of nations — Judicial caution — Whether law of nations adaptable to private rights — Interaction between ATS at time of its enactment and ambient law of era — Whether international norm prohibiting arbitrary arrest and detention — Treaties — Human rights instruments — Customary international law — Whether Alvarez having claim under ATS

Terrorism — Global war on terrorism context — Relevance — Foreign policy — Role of Congress and executive branches — National security — Whether non-justiciable political question — The law of the United States

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)