Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:13:38.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rudolf Hess Case

Germany, Federal Republic of.  16 December 1980 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State responsibility — Acts and omissions of State organs and officials — Duty to provide diplomatic protection to nationals in relation to foreign States — Discretionary nature of duty — Scope of judicial review

States — Conduct of foreign relations — Attempt to secure release of war criminal sentenced by International Military Tribunal — Proceedings instituted by individual to require his State of nationality to take more effective measures at international level to obtain his release

War and armed conflict — Enforcement of the laws of war — Crimes against peace — Charter of the International Military Tribunal, 1945 — Execution of sentences on war criminals — Imprisonment in Allied Military Prison in Spandau-Berlin — Prolonged detention of Rudolf Hess — Scope of duty of Federal Republic of Germany to seek to obtain his release — Division of responsibilities for detention between Federal Republic and Four Allied Powers

International organizations — United Nations — Powers — United Nations Charter 1945, Article 107 — Execution of sentences on war criminals handed down by International Military Tribunal — Prolonged imprisonment of Rudolf Hess in Allied Military Prison in Spandau-Berlin — Whether Article 107 of Charter precludes reference to organs of the United Nations of dispute over continued imprisonment — Division of responsbilities for imprisonment between Federal Republic of Germany and Four Allied Powers — Lack of appropriate forum for settlement of dispute

States — Continuity of States — Status of Germany after 1945 — Status of Berlin — Allied Military Prison in Spandau-Berlin — Division of responsibilities between Four Allied Powers and Federal Republic of Germany

Human rights — Punishment of crimes against peace — Prolonged imprisonment of war criminal convicted by International Military Tribunal — Attempt to obtain release on humanitarian grounds — Advanced age and fragile health — Scope of duty of Federal Republic of Germany to seek to obtain release — Delay in proceedings instituted before municipal courts to require Federal Republic to take more effective measures to obtain release — Right to hearing and decision within a reasonable time — Justifiable delay — The law of the Federal Republic of Germany

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)