Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:31:09.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pope and Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada

NAFTA Arbitration Tribunal under the UNCITRAL Rules.  07 January 2000 ; 26 January 2000 ; 24 February 2000 ; 26 June 2000 ; 07 August 2000 ; 06 September 2000 ; 10 April 2001 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Jurisdiction — Investment disputes — Definition — Whether measure relating to trade in goods capable of being measure relating to an investment — Procedural requirements for bringing claim — Waiver of right to institute or continue national proceedings — Whether going to jurisdiction

Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Procedure and evidence — Claim of Crown privilege — Whether available before UNCITRAL arbitral tribunal — Whether State required to identify documents and produce reasoned submissions regarding their confidentiality — Whether UNCITRAL Tribunal empowered to compel production of documents — Scope of solicitor-client privilege — Claim — Amendment to claim

Economics, trade and finance — North American Free Trade Agreement — Aims and objectives — Interpretation — Relationship with general international law — Requirement of national treatment — Minimum standard of treatment — Performance requirements

Expropriation — Definition — North American Free Trade Agreement, Article 1110 — Measures tantamount to expropriation — Meaning — Whether extending beyond concept of expropriation in general international law — Creeping expropriation

International tribunals — Arbitration tribunal — UNCITRAL — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — Jurisdiction and powers — Procedure and evidence

State responsibility — Treatment of aliens — Investor protection — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — National treatment — Meaning of “like circumstances” — Minimum standard of treatment — Fair and equitable treatment — Full protection and security — Use of terms in bilateral investment treaties — Expropriation

Treaties — Interpretation — Principles of interpretation — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Articles 31 to 33 — Application to North American Free Trade Agreement

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)