Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:18:02.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ministry of Defence of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Gould Inc and Others

United States.  23 October 1989 ; 30 June 1992 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Enforcement of award — Award by Iran — United States Claims Tribunal — Action for enforcement in municipal courts — New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958, Article V — Conditions for refusal of enforcement — Burden of proof — Requirement that award be based upon written arbitration agreement between parties — Iran-United States Algiers Accords, 1981 — Whether constituting written arbitration agreement between United States claimant and Iran — Decision turning on whether the President of the United States acting on behalf of United States nationals when signing Accords — Requirement that award of tribunal not exceed scope of dispute submitted to arbitration — Whether requirement that award be based on the national law of a signatory to the Convention

Claims — State control over private claims — Effect of inter-State agreement — Iran-United States Algiers Accords, 1981 — Executive order issued by President of United States implementing Accords — Order suspending existing claims by United States nationals against Iran in United States courts and referring such claims to Iran-United States Claims Tribunal — Whether President having power to refer claims of United States nationals to Tribunal

Economics, trade and finance — Export embargo — Legislative ban on arms sales to Iran — Award of Iran-United States Claims Tribunal requiring United States corporation to deliver military equipment to Iran — Whether award enforceable by United States court — Opinion of the United States Executive — Significance

International tribunals — Iran-United States Claims Tribunal — Awards — Whether award of Claims Tribunal enforceable under New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958 — Procedure — Failure by claimant to amend pleadings so as to reflect final submission to Claims Tribunal — Claims Tribunal basing its award on claimant' s final submission — Whether failure to amend pleading constituting ground for refusal to enforce award under New York Convention

Treaties — Interpretation — Objects and purposes — New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958 — The law of the United States

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)