Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:23:23.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Luedicke, Belkacem and Koç Case

European Court of Human Rights.  28 November 1978 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

The individual in international law — Human rights and freedoms — Right of accused person to the services of an interpreter — Whether State permitted to impose charge for interpreter’s services as part of order for costs if accused convicted — European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 6(3)(e) — Whether necessary to consider Article 14 in addition to Article 6

Treaties — Principles of interpretation — Whether literal interpretation contradicted by context, object and purpose of provision — Scope of provision to be interpreted with regard to underlying principle of ensuring a fair trial — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969

Procedure — Request to strike case from list — Application of European Convention, Article 50 — Whether case ready for decision — Costs of application

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)