No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Legality of Use of Force (Yugoslavia/Serbia and Montenegro v. Netherlands)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
International Court of Justice — Jurisdiction — Provisional measures — Prima facie basis for jurisdiction — Declarations under Article 36(2) of Statute of International Court of Justice — Condition of reciprocity — Temporal limitation — Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948, Article IX — Whether threat or use of force against a State amounting to genocide — Whether necessary element of intent towards defined group — Whether Serbia and Montenegro party to the Genocide Convention at relevant date — Whether Genocide Convention a treaty in force under Article 35(2) of the Statute of the Court — Article 4 of Netherlands–Yugoslavia Convention of Conciliation, Judicial Settlement and Arbitration, 1931 — Whether invoking new basis of jurisdiction at late stage acceptable
Treaties — Application — Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 1948 — Definition of genocide contained in Article II of Genocide Convention — Whether intended destruction of a national, ethnical, racial or religious group — Whether threat or use of force against a State constituting an act of genocide
International organizations — United Nations — Membership — Yugoslavia — Status of Yugoslavia between 1992 and 2000 — Whether Member of the United Nations — Whether party to Statute of International Court of Justice — Whether Yugoslavia having access to Court under Article 35(1) of Statute — Whether Yugoslavia having access to Court under Article 35(2) of Statute
State succession — Succession and continuity of States — Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia — Whether Serbia and Montenegro continuation of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia — Membership of the United Nations — Whether Yugoslavia party to Statute of International Court of Justice — Treaty obligations of the former Yugoslavia
War and armed conflict — NATO bombing of Yugoslavia — NATO Respondent States claiming humanitarian intervention — Loss of life and suffering in Kosovo — Whether NATO Respondent States violating obligation not to use force — Maintenance of peace and security — Role of Security Council — Responsibilities of Court under United Nations Charter and Statute of Court — Obligations of Parties under Charter and other rules of international law including humanitarian law
Keywords
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2015