Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:26:02.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of Nigeria and Others

United States.  19 October 1987 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — Whether presumption of sovereign immunity — Commercial activity exception — Distinction between sovereign and commercial acts — Lack of profit motive — Nigerian Consulate — Agreement to lease property as a residence for consular employees — Whether constituting a commercial activity — Non-commercial tort exception — Torts allegedly committed by consular employee causing damage to consular residence — Requirement that torts were committed within “scope of employment” — Requirement that torts not committed by foreign State in the exercise of discretionary function — Waiver — Forum selection clause — Lease concerning United States property — Lease providing for adjudication of disputes but not stipulating forum — Whether adjudication clause constituting waiver of immunity from United States jurisdiction — Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 1976

Consular relations — Immunity — Consular employee — Immunity from civil proceedings — Scope of immunity — Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, 1963, Article 43 — Immunity limited to official functions — “Acts performed in the exercise of consular functions” — Interpretation — Whether immunity covering proceedings brought against consular employee for alleged commitment of torts resulting in damage to consular residence — Difference between consular and sovereign immunity — The law of the United States

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)