Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:53:02.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

James and Others

European Court of Human Rights.  21 February 1986 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Expropriation — Public interest — Whether compulsory transfer of property from one individual to another can be in the public interest — Whether in pursuance of legitimate social objective — Residential property let on long lease — Tenant given right of enfranchisement — Landlord required to sell to tenant exercising right of enfranchisement — Price fixed by law below commercial price — United Kingdom Leasehold Reform Act 1967 and subsequent amendments — Compensation in the event of expropriation — Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether embodying right to compensation for owners of expropriated property — Reference to general principles of international law — Whether including international law measure of compensation — Whether requiring same measure of compensation for nationals as well as non-nationals — Discrimination — Whether different treatment of nationals and non-nationals objectively justified

Human rights — Property rights — Compulsory transfer of property from one individual to another — Whether violating Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Scope of right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions — Discrimination — Article 14 of European Convention — Whether differences in treatment objectively justified — Right to a hearing — Article 6(1) — Scope — Whether including right to challenge legislation — Enforcement — Article 13 — Duty of State to provide national remedy — Whether requiring State to incorporate Convention into national law — Whether requiring State to provide procedure whereby legislation can be challenged on grounds of incompatibility with Convention

International tribunals — Procedure — European Court of Human Rights — Applicant raising question not raised before European Commission of Human Rights — Whether within jurisdiction of Court

Treaties — Interpretation — Travaux préparatoires — Use to confirm interpretation arrived at by examination of text — Human rights treaties — General techniques of interpretation — The European Court of Human Rights

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)