Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:45:45.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heeralall v. Commissioner of Prisons

Mauritius.  30 March 1992 ; 30 July 1993 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Extradition — Treaties — Whether binding — Requirement of existence of a binding extradition treaty — State succession to treaties upon independence — Request for extradition of accused from Mauritius to France — Whether United Kingdom — France Extradition Treaty continuing to be binding in respect of Mauritius — Constitutional guarantees of due process — Whether absence of similar guarantees in requesting State precludes extradition of accused

State succession — Treaties — Extradition treaty — Colony achieving independence — Whether extradition treaty concluded by former colonial power still applicable — Attitude of other party to treaty

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Whether treaty in force for newly independent State — Admissibility of expert evidence

Treaties — Conclusion and operation — State succession — Whether treaty in force after independence — Nature of treaties — The law of Mauritius

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)