Article contents
Eckle Case
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
State responsibility — Nature and kinds of — For breaches of treaty obligations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Violation established — Just satisfaction — Material loss — Causal link between claims and breach of Convention — Non-pecuniary damage — Whether finding of violation already furnishes sufficient just satisfaction — Legal costs and expenses — Whether reasonable and actually incurred
State responsibility — Damages (Measure of damages) — Grounds for awarding damages — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 50 — Just satisfaction in respect of breach established — Material loss — Non-pecuniary damage — Legal costs and expenses
Disputes — Other international courts — European Court of Human Rights — Proceedings for just satisfaction under European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Request to defer judgment until national courts’ final decision on reparation — Whether suspension of proceedings would hinder proper administration of justice
The individual in international law — In general — Human rights and freedoms — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Violation of right to a hearing within a reasonable time established — Article 50 — Just satisfaction — Request to defer judgment until national courts' final decision on reparation — Whether suspension of proceedings would hinder proper administration of justice Material loss — Causal link between claims and breach of Convention — Non-pecuniary damage — Whether finding of violation sufficient just satisfaction — Particular circumstances to be taken into account — Legal costs and expenses — Whether reasonable and actually incurred — Proceedings before national courts — Proceedings before Convention institutions
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 1987
- 1
- Cited by