Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:15:57.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dispute Concerning the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.  14 March 2012 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Sea — Maritime boundary delimitation — Single maritime boundary — Territorial sea — United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 (“UNCLOS”) — Article 15 — Equidistance/special circumstances — Effect of islands in delimitation of territorial sea — EEZ — Continental shelf — Continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles — UNCLOS Articles 74 and 83 — Three-stage approach — Equidistance/relevant circumstances — Proportionality — Relevant coasts — Geographical context — Bay of Bengal — Coastal configuration — Concavity of coast — Cut-off effect — Angle-bisector method — Whether geographical configuration of Bay of Bengal warranting use of angle-bisector method — Effect of islands on delimitation of EEZ and continental shelf — UNCLOS Article 76 — Whether ITLOS having to await delineation of outer limits of continental shelf by Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf before delimiting continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles — “Grey area” issue — Whether UNCLOS allowing “grey areas”

International tribunals — International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea — United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 (“UNCLOS”) — Jurisdiction — Special agreement — Unilateral application — Maritime boundary delimitation — Whether ITLOS having jurisdiction to delimit continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles

Treaties — Binding international agreements — Whether 1974 Agreed Minutes binding international agreement on delimitation of territorial sea — Full powers — Registration of treaties — Whether legal nature and content of instrument determining whether binding treaty — Whether de facto or tacit agreement existing on territorial sea boundary — Whether Myanmar estopped from claiming 1974 Agreed Minutes constituting a binding agreement

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)