Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:04:34.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democratic Republic of the Congo and Others v. FG Hemisphere Associates LLC (No 2)

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.  08 September 2011 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

State immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — Absolute and restrictive doctrines of immunity — Customary international law — Law applicable in Hong Kong — Effect of the resumption of sovereignty by China — United Kingdom legislation on State immunity ceasing to have effect in Hong Kong — Common law applicable prior to resumption of sovereignty — Adherence by China to the absolute doctrine of immunity — United Nations Convention on the Jurisdictional Immunities of States, 2004 — China signing but not ratifying Convention — Whether act of signing Convention altering China’s position regarding absolute doctrine — Whether restrictive doctrine of immunity part of the law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

State — Autonomous regions — Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“HKSAR”) — Resumption of sovereignty by China — International status of HKSAR — HKSAR not a separate sovereign — Application of international law in HKSAR — Whether possible for HKSAR to apply doctrine of State immunity different from that adhered to by China — Responsibility of China for acts of HKSAR — Hong Kong Basic Law — Responsibility of central government for foreign affairs — State immunity falling within scope of foreign affairs

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Customary international law — State immunity — Relationship between customary international law and common law — China adhering to absolute immunity doctrine — Whether HKSAR entitled to apply restrictive doctrine — Role of courts and executive — Independence of the judiciary — The law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)