Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:00:15.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case of Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali

European Court of Human Rights.  28 May 1985 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Discrimination — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 14 — Scope — Requirement that Article 14 be taken in conjunction with another provision of Convention — No requirement of separate violation of other provisions — Discrimination contrary to Convention if State accords greater benefits than those required by provision of Convention but does so in a discriminatory fashion — Sex discrimination — Husband of woman lawfully settled in United Kingdom not permitted to settle in United Kingdom on same terms as wife of man lawfully settled in United Kingdom — Race discrimination — Preferential treatment for husbands of women possessing United Kingdom citizenship by birth in United Kingdom or with a parent born in the United Kingdom — Whether legitimate

Human rights — Private and family life — Duty of State to respect — Whether requiring State to permit alien husband of woman lawfully settled in State to settle with her — Inhuman and degrading treatment — Whether refusing him permission to reside in State with his wife inhuman and degrading treatment — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Articles 3 and 8

Human rights — Remedies in national law — Duty to provide remedies for violation of Convention rights — Convention not incorporated into English law — Whether remedy for breach of Convention available under English law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 13

Human rights — Immigration — Right of entry — Protocol No. 4 to European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether other provisions of Convention applicable to immigration matters

Aliens — Immigration — Right of entry — Whether State required to admit alien husband to reside with wife lawfully settled in State

Damages — Human rights violation — Non-pecuniary damage — Whether declaration of violation of Convention sufficient satisfaction — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 50

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Status of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, in English law — Duty of State party to Convention to provide remedy under national law

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)