Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:51:29.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case Concerning Passage Through The Great Belt (Finland v. Denmark)

International Court of Justice.  29 July 1991 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International Court of Justice — Provisional measures of protection — Whether Court must satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction on the merits before indicating provisional measures — Nature of interlocutory proceedings — Role of Court — Purpose of provisional measures — Preservation of rights pending decision on the merits — Whether necessary for Party requesting provisional measures to establish prima facie case that rights in question exist — Protection of disputed rights — Whether Party requesting provisional measures should give cross-undertaking to compensate if other Party successful on the merits — Relevance of remedies which might be granted on the merits — Whether relevant that Party resisting request for provisional measures contends that restitution would not be an appropriate remedy

Sea — Straits — Rights of passage — Whether right of passage through straits extends to structures more than 65 metres in height — Whether such structures constitute ships — Drill ships and oil rigs — Rights of passage for Finnish drill ships and oil rigs through Danish straits — Great Belt — Proposed bridge over Great Belt — Whether an infringement of Finnish rights of passage — Treaty of Copenhagen, 1857 — Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea, 1958 — United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 — Customary international law

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)