Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:26:13.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

International Court of Justice.  11 July 1996 ; 17 December 1997 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Jus cogens character of certain human rights norms — Prohibition of genocide — Genocide Convention, 1948 — Status — Nature of rights and obligations under Genocide Convention — Character as obligations erga omnes

International Court of Justice — Jurisdiction — Principles on which jurisdiction based — Whether Court should adopt strict approach to jurisdiction — Disputes clause in multilateral treaty — Genocide Convention, 1948, Article IX — Jurisdiction ratione personae — Whether Convention in force between claimant and respondent — Date at which Convention must be in force — Jurisdiction ratione materiae — Scope of Convention — Nature of disputes covered by Article IX — Jurisdiction ratione temporis — Admissibility

International Court of Justice — Counter-claims — Rules of Court, Article 80 — Definition of counter-claim — Requirement of direct connection between counter-claim and original claim — Meaning — Connection in fact and in law — Discretion of Court — Procedure — Whether Court obliged to hold oral proceedings on admissibility of counter-claim

International criminal law — Genocide — Genocide Convention, 1948 — Definition — Nature of obligations under Genocide Convention — Whether conferring rights and imposing responsibility upon States

International organizations — United Nations — Admission of new member — Significance — Admission of Bosnia and Herzegovina as member — Whether establishing Statehood of Bosnia and Herzegovina — Recognition of President of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Recognition — Of States and governments — Significance — Whether establishing that entity is a State — Whether signifying acceptance of claim to succession — Recognition of particular individual as Head of State — Significance of non-recognition — Whether treaty in force between States which do not recognize one another — Subsequent act of mutual recognition — Dayton — Paris Agreement between Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

State responsibility — Acts of State organs — Relationship between State responsibility and individual criminal responsibility — Genocide — Genocide Convention, 1948 — Whether State can be responsible for genocide contrary to the Convention — Whether dispute regarding alleged responsibility of State for genocide falling within Article IX of the Convention — Prohibition of genocide as obligation owed erga omnes — Significance

State succession — Dissolution of State — Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia — Emergence of Bosnia and Herzegovina as State — Treaty obligations of former Yugoslav State — Genocide Convention, 1948 — Whether Bosnia and Herzegovina succeeding to obligations of former Yugoslavia — Concept of automatic succession to certain treaties — Whether part of customary international law — Date on which Bosnia and Herzegovina became party to Genocide Convention

States — Existence — Admission to United Nations — Circumstances in which State created — Significance of recognition and non-recognition

Treaties — Application — Genocide Convention, 1948 — Nature of rights and obligations — Interpretation — Succession of new States

War and armed conflict — Character of conflict — Conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina — Whether internal or international — Allegations of genocide — Whether affected by character of conflict

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)