Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:01:46.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Awas Tingni Case

Inter-American Court of Human Rights.  01 February 2000 ; 31 August 2001 ; 06 September 2002 ; 26 November 2007 ; 14 March 2008 ; 07 May 2008 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Property rights — Recognition of indigenous land rights — Indigenous Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community in Nicaragua — Property rights to communal ancestral lands and natural resources — Use and enjoyment of property — Nature and content of right to property — Article 21 of American Convention on Human Rights, 1969 (“the Convention”) — Interpretation — Nature of relationship of Community with its traditional communal land and natural resources — Conservation — Indigenous custom and tradition — Right to property linked to physical and cultural survival of indigenous people — Whether Community having right that Nicaragua carry out delimitation, demarcation and titling of Community property — Whether Nicaragua having to abstain from granting concessions to third parties — Whether Nicaragua violating Article 21 of the Convention in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 of the Convention

Human rights — Right to judicial protection — Article 25 of the Convention — Whether effective procedure in Nicaragua for demarcation and titling of indigenous communal lands — Whether domestic legal measures adequate — Whether amparo remedy filed by Community members processed within reasonable time — Whether Nicaragua violating Article 25 of the Convention in relation to Articles 1(1) and 2 of the Convention

International tribunals — Inter-American Court of Human Rights — Case referred by Inter-American Commission on Human Rights — Procedure — Jurisdiction — Preliminary objection by Nicaragua — Exhaustion of domestic remedies — Articles 46 and 47 of the Convention — Competence of Court — Article 62(3) of the Convention — Admissibility — Merits — Evaluation of evidence — Reparations — Provisional measures — Court to monitor compliance with judgment

State responsibility — Human rights violations — State responsibility rules applicable under international human rights law — State responsible for actions or omissions by public authority — Article 1(1) of the Convention

Relationship of international law and municipal law — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969 — Constitution of Nicaragua — Indigenous community seeking demarcation of ancestral lands through Nicaraguan courts — Amparo remedy — Protection of ancestral lands and natural resources — Logging concession without Community consent — Whether constitutional — Whether Nicaragua adopting effective measures to ensure Community’s property rights — Whether Nicaragua providing effective remedy — Whether Nicaragua violating Articles 1(1), 2, 21 and 25 of the Convention

Damages — Reparations — Nicaragua to adopt measures to create effective mechanism for demarcation and titling of indigenous communal property — Nicaragua to carry out demarcation and titling of Community property and to abstain from granting concessions meanwhile — Judgment on merits — Monetary compensation for immaterial damages — Costs and expenses — Article 63(1) of the Convention

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)