Article contents
“ACSYNGO” and Others v. Compagnie de Saint-Gobain (France) SA and Others
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
Expropriation — Compensation — For lawful nationalization — Property of nationals of expropriating State — Payment of just and adequate compensation — Valuation of expropriated property — Assets of companies — Valuation based on average price of shares during reference period — Discrimination — Measures directed against particular companies — Requirement of equality of treatment — Public interest — Requirement that taking of property be necessary in the public interest
Expropriation — Extraterritorial effect — Nationalization of companies with their seat within the territory of nationalizing State — Effect on assets situated abroad — Indirect nationalization of foreign subsidiary — Separation of rights of shareholders from assets of company
Jurisdiction — Extraterritorial — Expropriatory legislation — Expropriation of shares in company — Effect on subsidiary owned by company in another State
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Recognition and effect of foreign laws — Public laws — Legislation providing for expropriation of shares in company — Circumstances in which legislation would be recognized by courts of another State — The law of Belgium
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 1990
- 2
- Cited by