Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:54:23.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Urechean and Pavlicenco v. Republic of Moldova

European Court of Human Rights.  02 December 2014 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Right to a fair trial — Right of access to a court — Applicants bringing libel action against former head of State in domestic courts — Domestic courts failing to consider whether impugned statements made in exercise of official duties — Competing interests — Whether head of State enjoying absolute immunity — Whether manner in which immunity rule applied constituting disproportionate restriction on applicants’ right of access to a court — Whether Republic of Moldova violating Article 6(1) of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

State immunity — Head of State immunity — Functional immunity — Whether absolute — Applicants bringing libel action against former head of State in domestic courts — Domestic courts failing to consider whether impugned statements made in exercise of official duties — Competing interests — Whether head of State enjoying blanket immunity — Whether manner in which immunity rule applied constituting disproportionate restriction on applicants’ right of access to a court — Whether Republic of Moldova violating Article 6(1) of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)