Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:43:27.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another

United Kingdom, England.  25 November 2015 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Effect in municipal law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 2 of Convention — Human Rights Act 1998 incorporating Convention — General principle of non-retrospectivity of Convention — Whether Convention binding Contracting Party in relation to act taking place before entry into force of Convention for that Party — Critical date — Whether State having duty to investigate a suspicious death occurring before critical date — Whether two requirements satisfied — Whether relevant acts or omissions after critical date — Whether genuine connection between death and critical date — Whether ten-year threshold exceeded — Whether critical date when United Kingdom recognizing right to petition or when Convention entering into force — Whether underpinning of underlying values of Convention necessary — Article 1 of Convention — Whether United Kingdom failing to secure to everyone within its jurisdiction right to life — Whether appellants having right to public inquiry under Article 2 of Convention

Treaties — Application — Human rights treaties — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 2 of Convention — General principle of non-retroactivity — Whether Convention binding Contracting Party in relation to act taking place before entry into force of Convention for that Party — Critical date — Whether State having duty to investigate a suspicious death occurring before critical date — Convention values — Whether underpinning of underlying values of Convention necessary — Whether appellants having right to public inquiry under Article 2 of Convention

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Customary international law — Whether international law requiring inquiry into killings by 1948 — Whether United Kingdom having obligation to investigate killings — Whether any principle could be recognized by common law — Whether appellants having right to public inquiry under common law by virtue of incorporated principles of customary international law — Whether decisions reached by respondents rational and proportionate — Whether appellants having right to public inquiry under common law by virtue of judicial review

Human rights — Human rights treaties — Nature and scope — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 1 — Duty of Contracting Parties to secure rights and freedoms under Convention to persons within their jurisdiction — Killings by British Army in State of Selangor in 1948 — Whether within jurisdiction of United Kingdom — Whether United Kingdom responsible for deaths — Whether United Kingdom responsible for holding inquiry into deaths — Whether United Kingdom failing to secure to everyone within its jurisdiction right to life — Whether appellants having right to public inquiry under Article 2 of Convention

Jurisdiction — Territory — State of Selangor — Former British Protected State in Federation of Malaya — Killings by British Army in Selangor in 1948 — Federation of Malaya becoming independent in 1957 — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Securing of rights and freedoms within United Kingdom jurisdiction — Whether deaths occurring in circumstances within jurisdiction of United Kingdom within meaning of Article 1 of Convention — Temporal jurisdiction — Whether deaths occurring within jurisdiction if Convention had been in force in Malaya in 1948 — Whether time between deaths and extension of Convention to Malayan Federation less than ten years — Whether Strasbourg test satisfied — Whether United Kingdom responsible for deaths in 1948 — Constitutional arrangements between United Kingdom and Federation of Malaya in 1957 — Whether affecting any domestic law duty — Whether United Kingdom exercising control over persons who died — Whether conduct of British Army within United Kingdom jurisdiction — Whether United Kingdom responsible for holding inquiry into deaths — Whether any jurisdictional obstacle to ordering an inquiry into killings

State succession — State of Selangor — Former British Protected State in Federation of Malaya — Killings by British Army in Selangor in 1948 — Federation of Malaya becoming independent in 1957 — Constitution of Federation of Malaya providing for rights, liabilities and obligations to pass from United Kingdom to Federation — Alleged misconduct by British Army — State liability for deaths — Whether remaining with State responsible for deaths or passing to successor State — Whether different constitutional arrangements between United Kingdom and Federation of Malaya affecting rights of victims against United Kingdom — Whether domestic rights arising from European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, international law or common law principles — Whether United Kingdom responsible for deaths — Whether United Kingdom having duty to hold inquiry into deaths

State responsibility — State of Selangor — Former British Protected State in Federation of Malaya — Killings by British Army in Selangor in 1948 — Federation of Malaya becoming independent in 1957 — Constitution of Federation of Malaya providing for rights, liabilities and obligations to pass from United Kingdom to Federation — Alleged misconduct by British Army — State liability for deaths — Whether remaining with State responsible for deaths or passing to successor State — Whether different constitutional arrangements between United Kingdom and Federation of Malaya affecting rights of victims against United Kingdom — Whether domestic rights arising from European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, international law or common law principles — Whether United Kingdom responsible for deaths — Whether United Kingdom having duty to hold inquiry into deaths

Human rights — Right to life — Article 2 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Duty to investigate suspicious deaths — Separate and autonomous duty — Jurisprudence of European Court of Human Rights — ŠilihJanowiec — Convention not binding Contracting Party in relation to act taking place before date of entry into force of Convention with respect to that party — Critical date — Non-retrospectivity of Convention — Whether State having duty to investigate suspicious death occurring before critical date — Temporal jurisdiction — Genuine connection — Convention values — Whether United Kingdom having duty to hold inquiry into deaths

War and armed conflict — Killings by British Army in State of Selangor in Federation of Malaya in 1948 — State of emergency in Malaya — Federation of Malaya former British Protected State — Federation of Malaya becoming independent in 1957 — Whether United Kingdom responsible for deaths — Whether United Kingdom having duty to hold inquiry into deaths — The law of the United Kingdom

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)