Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:59:38.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom)

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea 2001.  03 December 2001 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International tribunals — Provisional measures of protection — International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea — Applicable law — United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 (“UNCLOS”) — Ireland and United Kingdom both States Parties to UNCLOS — Request by Ireland for the establishment of an Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal — Request by Ireland for the indication of provisional measures under UNCLOS Article 290(5) pending constitution of Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal

Sea — Marine environment — UNCLOS — Environmental effects of the MOX nuclear plant and of international movements of radioactive materials — Obligation to cooperate in taking measures to protect and preserve the Irish Sea — Precautionary principle

Treaties — Interpretation and application — UNCLOS — Compulsory procedures for settlement of disputes — UNCLOS Articles 281 and 282 — Whether applicable — Relationship between Article 282 and compulsory dispute settlement procedures under other treaties — Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic, 1992 (“OSPAR Convention”) — Treaty Establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, 1957 (“Euratom Treaty”) — Treaty Establishing the European Community, 1957 (“EC Treaty”) — Commencement of dispute settlement procedures under the OSPAR Convention not precluding resort to compulsory dispute settlement under UNCLOS — Provisions of other treaties not relevant to dispute concerning the interpretation and application of UNCLOS — UNCLOS Article 282 not applicable

Sea — UNCLOS — Article 290(5) — Conditions to be satisfied for prescription of provisional measures under Article 290(5) — Whether prima facie basis for the jurisdiction of the Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal — Whether urgent necessity for prescription of provisional measures pending the constitution of Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal — Irreparable prejudice — Serious harm to the marine environment — Requirement of urgency not satisfied — Power of International Tribunal to prescribe provisional measures different in whole or in part to those requested

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)