Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:19:44.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mondev International Ltd v. United States of America

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (Additional Facility) (NAFTA Chapter 11).  25 September 2000 ; 13 November 2000 ; 25 January 2001 ; 27 February 2001 ; 11 October 2002 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Jurisdiction — NAFTA, Articles 1102, 1105 and 1110 — Application to acts done before NAFTA’s entry into force — National court decisions after entry into force — Retrospective effect — Proceedings brought under NAFTA Article 1116(1) — Whether brought “on behalf of an enterprise” — Failure to rely on Article 1117(1) — Admissibility — Claim brought more than three years after incidents causing damage — Three-year time-limit — Application — NAFTA, Article 1116(2)

Arbitration — Procedure — NAFTA, Chapter 11 — Claim pursuant to Additional Facility Rules — Place of arbitration — Relevant factors — Joinder of jurisdictional objections to merits — Extent of discovery — Confidentiality of proceedings — Application of national freedom of information legislation to pleadings, minutes of meetings and orders of Tribunal — Extent and duration of parties’ obligation of confidentiality absent statutory obligations of disclosure — NAFTA Article 1126, Annex 1137.4 — Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules, Articles 14, 24, 38 and 44 — Award of costs and expenses — Extent of Tribunal’s discretion

State responsibility — Expropriation — Investments — Termination of an investment — Lapse of contractual option — Bank’s foreclosure on mortgage over investment property — Subsisting claims under national law — Whether an “investment” Relevance of ownership of national law proprietary rights — NAFTA, Article 1139

State responsibility — Treatment of aliens — NAFTA, Article 1105(1) — Denial of justice — Whether “new law” applied retrospectively — Procedural decisions — Scope and standard of NAFTA review — “Full protection and security” — Statutory immunity of State agency in respect of intentional torts — Tortious interference with contractual relations — Jury finding implying lack of legitimate regulatory purpose — Whether immunity in breach of Article 1105(1) — Non-application of trade practices law to regulatory authority

Treaties — Interpretation — Subsequent practice — NAFTA — Free Trade Commission interpretation — Whether binding on Chapter 11 Tribunal — Whether “interpretation” or “amendment” — Scope of FTC interpretation — Effect on pending proceedings

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)