Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:02:14.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mannesmann A.G., DüSseldorf, and others v. The High Authority.

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS.  04 April 1960 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Court of Justice of the European Communities — Provisional measures — Request for suspension of decision of High Authority — Requirement that decision must be challenged in principal appeal prior to or concurrent with request — Decision involving pecuniary obligations — Forced execution — Requirement of justifiable fear of forced execution — Rules of Procedure, Articles 63 and 64.

Court of Justice of the European Communities — Rectification of judgment — Obvious inaccuracies — Distinction between rectification and interpretation of judgment — Rules of Procedure, Article 57.

International organization — European Coal and Steel Community — Competence of High Authority — Treaty, Article 92 — Decision of High Authority demanding repayment of subsidy paid to plaintiffs as result of fraudulent certificate — Implied power of Authority to enforce repayment of sums wrongly paid — Whether Authority should enforce repayment by private law means — Public law nature of subsidy system — Liability of enterprises to check certifying documents — Whether plaintiffs benefited from unjustified enrichment — Whether plaintiffs liable to repay subsidy — Decision violating rule of law concerning application of Treaty.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)