Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:14:36.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

J H Rayner (mincing Lane) Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry and Other and Related Appeals Maclaine Watson & Co Ltd v. Department of Trade and Industry Maclaine Watson & Co Ltd v. International Tin Council

England.  26 October 1989 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International organizations — Personality — Concept of international legal personality — Whether organization a legal entity distinct from its members — Whether personality of organization excludes liability of members for obligations incurred by the organization — Whether principle of international law that members incur concurrent or secondary liability for debts of organization in absence of provision excluding or limiting liability — International Tin Council — Sixth International Tin Agreement, 1982 — Comparison with constitutions of other international organizations — Whether International Tin Council contracted as agent for its members — Legal personality of international organization in English law — Whether distinct from personality of organization in international law — International Organizations Act 1968 — International Tin Council-United Kingdom Headquarters Agreement, 1972 — International Tin Council (Immunities and Privileges) Order 1972 — Provision that Council should have the legal capacities of a body corporate — Whether conferring legal personality in English law — Whether a recognition of Council’s international legal personality — Whether English courts entitled to consider Sixth International Tin Agreement to determine scope and nature of Council’s personality

International organizations — Constitutions — International Tin Council — Whether Council controlled by its members — Whether a separate entity from its members — Whether Council contracted as agent for its members

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Act of State and justiciability — Doctrine of non-justiciability in English law — Scope and extent — Principle that unincorporated treaties cannot change English law — Principle that English courts cannot enforce an unincorporated treaty — Act of State doctrine — Principle that English courts will not sit in judgment upon transactions between sovereign States — Relationship between the different principles of act of State and non-justiciability — Relationship between act of State and non-justiciability and principles of sovereign immunity

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Custom — Whether part of the law of England — Extent to which English courts may apply rules of international law — Uncertain state of rules in question — Role of the English courts in determining content of international law — Treaties — Application by municipal courts — Treaty not incorporated into municipal law by legislation — Whether municipal courts may enforce obligations of States derived from treaty — Whether municipal courts may refer to treaty establishing international organization in order to establish nature of organization’s personality in international law

Sources of international law — Customary international law — Criteria for determining existence of rule of international law — Need for general acceptance of rule by civilized nations — Treaties — Treaties establishing international organizations — Significance of presence in certain treaties of provisions excluding liability of members for debts of organization — Writings of publicists — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)