No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
In the Arbitration regarding the Iron Rhine (“Ijzeren Rijn”) Railway between the Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of the Netherlands
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
Arbitration — Dispute — Jurisdiction — Submission of dispute to Arbitral Tribunal — Belgium — Netherlands Arbitration Agreement 2003 — Applicable law — International law — Relevance of European law — Role of tribunal in relation to European Community law — EC Treaty, Article 292 — Arbitral Award — Allocation of costs — Committee of independent experts to quantify — Interpretation of Award
Treaties — Interpretation — Treaty of Separation, 1839, Article XII — Boundary Treaty, 1842 — Iron Rhine Treaty, 1873 — Rights and obligations of Parties — Legal significance of terms — Belgium’s transit right — Legal basis and scope — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969 — Articles 31 and 32 — Principles of interpretation — Ordinary meaning — Context — Good faith — Principle of effectiveness — Principle of restrictive interpretation — Relevance — Intertemporal rule — Evolutive treaty interpretation — Object and purpose of treaty — European law — General international law — International environmental law — Concepts of reasonableness, fairness and balance
Territory — Sovereignty — Separation of Belgium from Netherlands — Communication link between Antwerp and Germany — Article XII of Treaty of Separation, 1839 — Iron Rhine Treaty, 1873 — Netherlands conferring on Belgium right of transit over Netherlands territory — Extent of Netherlands’ sovereignty — Netherlands’ exercise of jurisdiction over Iron Rhine railway — Whether limited by Netherlands’ obligations under international law — Obligations of good faith and reasonableness — Whether Belgium’s right of transit circumscribed by requirements in Article XII of Treaty of Separation, 1839 — Whether Netherlands violating Belgium’s rights under Article XII of Treaty of Separation, 1839 — Netherlands designating the Meinweg as nature reserve — Whether legitimate exercise of Netherlands’ sovereignty — Whether duty to consult — Financial consequences
Environment — International environmental law — Development since 1972 Stockholm Conference — Duty to prevent or mitigate significant harm to environment — Need to reconcile economic development with protection of environment — Whether environmental protection measures integral part of reactivation project and costs
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Article XII of Treaty of Separation, 1839 — Netherlands’ obligations under Article XII — Measures envisaged by Netherlands for reactivation of Iron Rhine railway — Netherlands legislation — Whether Netherlands required to apply national legislation and policy with respect to Iron Rhine railway in more favourable way than to other railways in Netherlands — Whether such application amounting to denial of Belgium’s transit right — Whether rendering exercise of transit right unreasonably difficult
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2011