Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:40:14.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Handyside Case

European Court of Human Rights.  07 December 1976 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

The individual in international law — Human rights and freedoms — Freedom of expression — Limits on freedom of expression — Conviction of publisher and seizure of publications under obscenity legislation — Whether restrictions necessary for the protection of morals — No common European concept of morals — Margin of appreciation afforded to State authorities — Function of freedom of expression in a democratic society — Relevance of age of target readership of literature — Relevance of attitude of other European States towards same publication — Relevance of attitude of national authorities towards other similar publications — European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Articles 10, 17 and 18

Discrimination — Whether seizure of allegedly obscene literature politically motivated — European Convention, Article 14

Deprivation of possessions — Meaning — Provisional seizure pending trial — Eventual destruction — Whether necessary — First Protocol to the European Convention, Article 1

European Court of Human Rights — Jurisdiction — Supervisory role in relation to Article 10 and Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention — Capacity to review decisions of national authorities — Capacity to consider allegation already rejected by Commission as manifestly ill-founded

Treaties — Interpretation — Bilingual treaties — Comparison of French and English texts

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)