No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Diggs v. Schultz
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
International law in general — Relation to municipal law — Treaty obligations — Duty of Member States under United Nations Charter to comply with Security Council Resolution on Southern Rhodesia — Power of Congress to override this obligation — Political question — The law of the United States
States as international persons — In general — Sovereignty and independence — Conduct of foreign relations — Power of United States Congress to override treaty obligations — Role of the courts — Political question — The law of the United States
International organization and administration — The United Nations — The Security Council — Obligation of Member States to comply with Security Council resolution — Consideration in municipal court — Legislation inconsistent with this obligation — Security Council Resolution 232 on Southern Rhodesia — The law of the United States
Treaties — Conclusion and operation of treaties — Operation and enforcement — Necessity for municipal legislation — Congressional power to override specific treaty obligations — Duty to comply with Security Council Resolution — Embargo on trade with Southern Rhodesia — Whether Congress authorizing breach of embargo — Political question — The law of the United States
Keywords
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 1981