No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
De Jong, Baljet and Van Den Brink Case
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
Human rights — Arrest and detention — Freedom from — Permissible restrictions — Arrest and detention on remand of conscript servicemen — Offences contrary to military code — Validity — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 5(1) — Right to be brought before officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power — Article 5(3) — Authority with advisory power — Auditeur-militair — Internal practice of following his advice — Whether sufficient — Independence — Right to speedy determination of legality of detention — Article 5(4) — Whether period of entitlement to run concurrently with period in Article 5(3) — Delays under military procedure — Whether a deprivation of access to speedy determination — Discrimination — Whether justifiable — Article 14 in conjunction with Article 5
International tribunals — Jurisdiction — Preliminary objections — Non-exhaustion of domestic remedies — Article 26 — Stage in proceedings at which objection to be raised — Estoppel — Effectiveness and accessibility of domestic remedies — Burden of proof — Whether applicants qualify as “victims” — Whether proof of detriment required — Article 25 — European Commission and Court of Human Rights
Damages — Human rights violations — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, Article 50 — Non-pecuniary loss
- Type
- Case Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 1988