Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:46:15.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A and Others v. Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

Court of Justice of the European Union.  14 March 2017 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Economics, trade and finance — Economic sanctions — Freezing of assets — Implementation in European Union law of sanctions imposed by United Nations Security Council — United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 (2003) to combat terrorism — Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010 implementing Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Applicants’ assets frozen by Dutch authorities pursuant to EU Implementing Regulation — Applicants’ assets frozen on basis of funding organization regarded as terrorist organization — Organization listed under Article 2(3) of Regulation — Whether organization engaged in terrorist acts — Definition of terrorist acts — Whether actions by armed forces during periods of armed conflict within meaning of international humanitarian law constituting “terrorist acts” for purposes of European Union law — Validity of Implementing Regulation

Terrorism — Measures to combat terrorism — European Union law — International law — Treaties — International humanitarian law — United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 (2003) — Implementation by European Union — Organization regarded as terrorist organization — Organization listed under Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Whether actions by armed forces during periods of armed conflict within meaning of international humanitarian law constituting “terrorist acts” for purposes of European Union law — EU Framework Decision 2002/475 — Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP and Regulation 2580/2001 — Objectives — Definitions of “terrorist act” — Relevance — Validity of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010

War and armed conflict — Non-international armed conflicts — Actions of armed forces governed by international humanitarian law — Geneva Conventions, 1949, Common Article 2 — Geneva Conventions, Common Article 3 — Article 1 of Protocol I — Articles 1, 4, 6 and 13(2) of Protocol II — Whether actions of armed forces capable of constituting terrorist acts for purposes of European Union law — Validity of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010

International organizations — United Nations — United Nations Security Council Resolutions (“UNSCRs”) — UNSCR 1373 (2003) to combat terrorism — Implementation by European Union — Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 — Organization listed under Article 2(3) of EU Regulation — Whether actions by armed forces during periods of armed conflict within meaning of international humanitarian law constituting “terrorist acts” for purposes of European Union law — Validity of Implementing Regulation

International organizations — European Union — Implementing Regulation — Interpretation — Context — Imposition of restrictive measures — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of group on list of those whose funds were to be frozen pursuant to Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Whether actions by armed forces during periods of armed conflict within meaning of international humanitarian law precluded from constituting “terrorist acts” for purposes of European Union law — Validity of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — International humanitarian law — United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 (2003) to combat terrorism — Implementation by European Union — European Union law — Objectives — Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2010 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 — Dutch law — Dutch authorities freezing assets of applicants pursuant to EU Implementing Regulation — Applicants’ assets frozen on basis of funding organization regarded as terrorist organization — Organization listed under Article 2(3) of Regulation — Whether organization engaged in terrorist acts — Definition of terrorist acts — Whether actions by armed forces during periods of armed conflict within meaning of international humanitarian law constituting “terrorist acts” for purposes of European Union law — Validity of Implementing Regulation

International tribunals — Court of Justice of the European Union — Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Admissibility of actions for annulment of Implementing Regulation by applicants — Inclusion of group on list of those whose funds were to be frozen pursuant to Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Applicants not themselves appearing on list — Whether applicants permitted to invoke invalidity of Implementing Regulation in main proceedings — The law of the European Union

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)