Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:13:51.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Achmea BV (formerly known as Eureko BV) v. Slovak Republic

Arbitration Tribunal.  07 December 2012 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Arbitration — Applicable law — Investment arbitration — Proceedings instituted by investor incorporated in one European Union State against another European Union State — Bilateral investment treaty between two European Union States — Whether compatible with European Union law — Whether European Union law forming part of the law to be applied by the tribunal — Seat of arbitration in a third European Union State — Jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunal — Costs — UNCITRAL Rules, Article 40(1)

Damages — Principle of full compensation for loss — Chorzów Factory principle — Causation — Cost of suspension of activities of investment — Valuation — Cost of borrowing — Interest

Economics, trade and finance — Investment — Bilateral investment treaty — Fair and equitable treatment — Health insurance business — Ban on profits and prohibition of sale of portfolio — Full protection and security — Free transfers

Expropriation — Investment — Bilateral investment treaty — Protection against expropriation — Requirement of deprivation of investment — Measures subsequently reversed — Whether amounting to deprivation of property

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)