1. Camporesi, Piero, Bread of Dreams (Chicago, 1989), 69Google Scholar.

2. Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York, 1979), 25–26Google Scholar.

3. Ibid., 29–30.

4. Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction (New York, 1980), 143–44Google Scholar.

5. Ibid., 88–89.

6. Ibid., 97, 88–89.

7. Foucault, , Discipline and Punish, 221, 225Google Scholar. I shall return below to Foucault's “men.”

8. Ibid., 193.

9. Ibid., 190.

10. Foucault, . History of Sexuality, 1:25Google Scholar.

11. Ibid., 25, 24, 103, 108, 104–5.

12. Ibid., 120–21. For a similar condescension from posterity on the unfeeling nature of the plebeian family, see Flandrin, Jean-Louis, Families in Former Times (Cambridge, 1979; French, ed., 1976)Google Scholar.

13. Foucault, , History of Sexuality, I:126Google Scholar.

14. Donzelot, Jacques, The Policing of Families (New York, 1979), 69, 92, 94 (emphasis added)Google Scholar.

15. The metaphor (and the title of this essay) is taken from a theory of evolution propounded by Eldredge, Niles and Gould, Stephen Jay (“Punctuated Equilibria: an Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism,” in Models in Paleobiology, ed. Schopf, T. J. M. [San Francisco, 1972], 82–115).Google Scholar Eldredge and Gould argue in favor of a jerky and episodic model of change, not a smoothly gradual pace. Pervasive trends in the fossil record reveal a trend that is more like climbing a flight of stairs (punctuations and stasis) rather than rolling up an inclined plane.

16. Quoted in Wrigley, E. A., Continuity, Chance and Change: The Character of the Industrial Revolution in England (Cambridge, 1988), 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Harrison, J. F. C., Early Victorian England, 1832–1851 (London, 1981), 59.Google Scholar See also Samuel, Raphael, “The Workshop of the World: Steam Power and Hand Technology in Mid-Victorian Britain,” History Workshop 3 (Spring 1977): 6–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. The point is put baldly; it should perhaps be qualified by referring to competition both within industries and between countries. Nevertheless, the basic issue is that the supply of labor outstripped its demand and proletarians labored at a severe disadvantage until there could be a semblance of order in this marketplace.

19. Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Macpherson, C. B. (Harmondsworth, 1968), pt. 1, chap. 13, 186.Google Scholar I shall return below to Hobbes's “man.”

20. Floud, R., Gregory, Annabel, and Wachter, Kenneth, Height, Health and History: Nutritional Status in the United Kingdom 1750–1980 (Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar Quantitative research of this sort provides a privileged look into the ideological dimension of the eugenics debates in the age of imperialism at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century. What English eugenicists mistook for “physical deterioration” was, in fact, a massive improvement over the conditions that had prevailed in the bleakest period of the Industrial Revolution, before 1850.

21. Anderson, Michael, “The Emergence of the Modern Life Cycle in Britain,” Social History 10 (1985): 72ffCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

22. Davis, Kingsley and van den Oever, Pietronella, “Demographic Foundations of New Sex Roles,” Population and Development Review 8 (1982): 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Watkins, Susan Cotts, Menken, Jane, and Bongaarts, John, “Demographic Foundations of Family Change,” American Sociological Review 52 (1987): 346–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23. For a discussion of this point and other general statements regarding early modern demography, see Flinn, Michael, The European Demographic System, 1520–1800 (Baltimore. 1981).Google Scholar and Smith, Daniel Scott, “A Homeostatic Demographic Regime: Patterns in West European Family Reconstitution Studies,” in Population Patterns in the Past, ed. Lee, R. D. (New York, 1977), 19–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24. “L'histoire immobile” is translated as “History That Stands Still” in Ladurie, Emmanuel LeRoy, The Mind and Method of the Historian (Chicago, 1981), 1–27Google Scholar.

25. The classic statement in recent historiography is Ladurie, Emmanuel LeRoy, The Peasants of Languedoc (Urbana, 1974).Google Scholar It was only in the third quarter of the nineteenth century that something approaching a modern labor market emerged in the world's first industrial nation. See Pollard, Sidney, “Labour in Great Britain,” in The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. 7, pt. 1, eds., Mathias, P. and Postan, M. M. (Cambridge, 1978), 164Google Scholar.

26. Flinn, Michael, “The Stabilization of Mortality in Pre-Industrial Western Europe,” Journal of European Economic History 3 (1974)Google Scholar.

27. In England, the highest recorded infant mortality rates in the nineteenth century were those of 1899. In that year in Liverpool, for example, the infant mortality rate among the poorest of the proletariat was an appalling 509 per 1,000 in the first year of life. Smith, F. B., The People's Health (London, 1979), 65–69Google Scholar.

28. This marvelous phrase is Hufton's, Olwen. See The Poor in Eighteenth-Century France (Oxford, 1974)Google Scholar.

29. “Demographic Origins of the European Proletariat,” in Proletarianization and Family History, ed. Levine, David (Orlando. 1974), 32–34Google Scholar.

30. For a good discussion of the feeble attempts of the early modern state to initiate “moralization.” see Strauss, Gerald, Luther's House of Learning (Baltimore, 1978)Google Scholar.

31. For two very penetrating discussions of the “medicalization” of gender differences, see Thomas Laqueur, “Orgasm, Generation, and the Politics of Reproductive Biology.” and Schiebinger, Londa, “Skeletons in the Closet: The First Illustrations of the Female Skeleton in Eighteenth-Century Anatomy,” in The Making of the Modern Body, eds., Gallagher, Catherine and Laqueur, Thomas (Berkeley, 1987), 1–41 and 42–82Google Scholar.

32. For an initial attempt to do so, see Levine, David, “Recombinant Family Formation Strategies,” Journal of Historical Sociology 2 (1989): 100–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a cross-sectional analysis of fertility by occupation, see Haines, Michael, “Social Class Differentials during Fertility Decline: England and Wales Revisited,” Population Studies 43 (1989): 305–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

33. McLaren, Angus, Reproductive Rituals (London, 1984)Google Scholar.

34. Accampo, Elinor, Industrialization, Family Life, and Class Relations: Saint Chamond, 1815–1914 (Berkeley, 1989)Google Scholar.

35. Alter, George, Family and the Female Life Course: The Women of Verviers, Belgium, 1849–1880 (Madison, 1988), 171Google Scholar.

36. For Germany, see Knodel, John. Demographic Behavior in the Past (Cambridge. 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar For England, see Levine, David, Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism (New York, 1977)Google Scholar.

37. The best discussion of these workers if found in Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (London, 1963), Section 2, “ExperiencesGoogle Scholar.”

38. For a discussion of this point, see Smith, Ruth L. and Valenze, Deborah M., “Mutuality and Marginality: Liberal Moral Theory and Working-Class Women in Nineteenth-Century England,” Signs 13 (1988): 277–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Seccombe, Wally, “Patriarchy Stabilized: The Construction of the Male Breadwinner Wage Norm in Nineteenth-Century Britain,” Social History 11 (1986). 53–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39. Andrew, Donna, Philanthropy and Police: London Charity in the Eighteenth Century (Princeton, 1988)Google Scholar: Lynch, Katherine, Family, Class, and Ideology in Early Industrial France (Madison, 1988)Google Scholar.

40. Donzelot, , Policing of Families, 16Google Scholar.

41. Vinokur, Annie, “Malthusian Ideology and the Crises of the Welfare State,” in Malthus and His Time, ed. Turner, Michael (London, 1986), 170–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42. Foucault, , History of Sexuality, 1:95Google Scholar.

43. Hogan, David, “The Market Revolution and Disciplinary Power: Joseph Lancaster and the Psychology of the Early Classroom System,” History of Education Quarterly 29 (1989): 381–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44. Colls, Robert, The Pitmen of the Northern Coalfield (Manchester, 1987), 137, 144Google Scholar.

45. Lynch, , Family, Class, and Ideology, 232, 226Google Scholar.

46. Frye's memories, delivered with some hyperbole in a public address, are quoted in Ayre, John, “Northrop Frye: A Biography,” Toronto Globe and Mail, October 28, 1989, C–1.Google Scholar My mother was schooled in Manchester between 1910 and 1919, and her reminiscences of that education are not sentimental. It too was a schooling overseen by “strapping spinsters” who “knuckled” any girl who did not show the proper respect and “civility”; recalcitrant girls were “closeted.”

47. Lynch, , Family, Class, and Ideology, 14 n. 29Google Scholar, quoting Leclerc, Gerard, L'observation de l'homme: Une histoire des enquetes sociales (Paris, 1979), 196Google Scholar.

48. Watkins, Susan Cotts, From Provinces to Nations: Demographic Integration in Western Europe, 1870–1960 (Princeton, 1990)Google Scholar.

49. Lynch, , Family, Class, and Ideology, 79Google Scholar, quoting Dupin, Charles, Des forces productives et commercials de la France, Vol. I (Paris, 1827), 101–2.Google Scholar For a view of schooling and scholars which is less willing to take the power of the status quo at its own evaluation, see Humphries, Stephen, Hooligans or Rebels? (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar For a discussion of what inclusion into “the gentle empire of moral habits” meant for its inhabitants, see Willis, Paul, Learning to Labour: How Working-Class Kids Get Working-Class Jobs (Farnborough, 1978)Google Scholar.

50. For a revealing acknowledgment of this malign neglect, see Holmes, Edmond, In Quest of an Ideal (London, 1920).Google Scholar Holmes was a school inspector in the 1870s and 1880s; his memoirs reveal him to have been narrowly concerned with “social control” (as directed by his superiors) during his tenure in office but sentimentally upset in retrospect by the suffering that this policy inflicted upon its young victims.

51. Abrams, Phillip (1977), as quoted in Philip Corrigan and Derek Sayer, The Great Arch (Oxford, 1985), 8Google Scholar.

52. Tocqueville, Alexis de, Democracy in America, Vol. I (The Henry Reeve Text, as revised by Francis Bowen, edited by Bradley, Phillips) (New York, 1945), 266, 273, 330Google Scholar.

53. On this point, see the discussions in Andrew, Philanthropy and Police, and Lynch, Family, Class, and Ideology.

54. McNeill, William H., The Pursuit of Power (Chicago, 1982), 261, 294Google Scholar.

55. Zelizer, Viviana, Pricing the Priceless Child (New York, 1985)Google Scholar.

56. Mass Observation (London, 1945), 74–75Google Scholar.

57. Martin, Anna, “The Irresponsibility of the Father, Part II,” in The Nineteenth Century and After (publisher unknown, 1919), 553.Google Scholar I owe this reference to Ellen Ross.

58. Marx, Karl, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, in Marx and Engels: Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy, ed. Feuer, Lewis (New York, 1959), 320Google Scholar.

59. Lummis, Trevor, Occupation and Society (Cambridge, 1985), 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60. Weber, Max, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, ed. Parsons, Talcott (New York, 1968), 62Google Scholar.