Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:50:42.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to J. Rancière “The Myth of the Artisan”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

William H. Sewell Jr
Affiliation:
University of Arizona

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Scholarly Controversis
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Saint-Léon, Etienne Martin, Histoire des corporations de métiers, depuis leurs origines jusqu'à leur suppression en 1791 (Paris. 1906), 590–3Google Scholar.

2. Truant, Cynthia. “Compagnonnage: Symbolic Action and Defense of Workers' Rights in France, 1700–1848” (Ph.D. dissertation. University of Chicago. 1978)Google Scholar.

3. Tilly, Charles and Lees, Lynn. “Le Peuple de Juin 1848.” Annales: Economies, sociétés, civilisations 29 (September–October 1974), 1076–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. Sewell, William H. Jr., “La Classe ouvrière de Marseille sous la Seconde Rèpublique: Structure sociale et comportement politique,” Le Mouvement social 76 (July–september 1971), 64–5Google Scholar. An English translation is “The Working Class of Marseille under the Second Republic: Social Structure and Political Behavior,” in Workers in the Industrial Revolution: Recent Studies of Labor in the United States and Europe, ed. by Stearns, Peter N. and Walkowitz, Daniel J. (New Brunswick, N.J., 1974), 115–6Google Scholar.