No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Introduction: Visualizing Space and Narrating Work
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2012
Extract
Miriam Glucksmann's ethnography of factory work, Women on the Line, was republished in 2009, nearly thirty years after the publication of the first edition in 1982 under the pseudonym, Ruth Cavendish. The original text is unchanged, but the new edition includes a new introduction and additional images. It is an account of Glucksmann's time working in a factory in the late 1970s, something she undertook as a political act and not with the intention of writing an ethnography, as she herself discusses below. The book was quickly recognized as a seminal account of women's work and one which disentangled the operation of gender at work. It exposed the construction of sexual difference and drew attention to forms of solidarity between women of different ethnic backgrounds. Indeed, Women on the Line is considered to be “a paradigmatic example of gender as central to understanding work” and one that has been studied closely and critiqued as well as admired. Two other “feminist ethnographies”—as they came to be described—were published at around the same time: Anna Pollert's Girls, Wives, Factory Lives in 1981, and Sallie Westwood's All Day, Every Day in 1984. They continue to be widely cited and remain key references in sociology text books and on student reading lists.
- Type
- Thirty Years on from Women on the Line: Researching Gender and Work
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 2012
References
NOTES
1. There is a discussion of the republication of Women on the Line with Miriam Glucksmann at http://nowaytomakealiving.net/post/616.
2. Halford, Susan and Strangleman, Tim, “In Search of the Sociology of Work,” Sociology 43 (2009): 815CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3. Beechey, Veronica, “What's So Special about Women's Employment? A Review of Some Recent Studies of Women's Paid Work,” Feminist Review 15 (1983): 23–45Google Scholar; Oakley, Ann, Book Review, The British Journal of Sociology 34 (1983): 278Google Scholar.
4. Williams, Anne, “Diversity and Agreement in Feminist Ethnography,” Sociology 27 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5. See for instance, Strangleman, Tim and Warren, Tracey, Work and Society (London, 2008)Google Scholar.
6. This discussion was first put together as a panel at the Work, Employment and Society Conference (Brighton, September 2010). I approached Miriam with the idea of the panel that I then chaired.
7. Glucksmann, Miriam, Women on the Line (London, 2009), 6Google Scholar.
8. Lefebvre, Henri, The Production of Space (Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar.
9. Grasseni, Christina, “Skilled Vision: An Apprenticeship in Breeding Aesthetics,” Social Anthropology 12 (2007): 41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10. Grasseini, “Skilled Vision,” 41.
11. Glucksmann, Women on the Line, 109.
12. Ferree, Myra Marx, Book Review, Contemporary Sociology 25 (1996), 448CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13. Stoller, Paul, The Taste of Ethnographic Things, (Philadelphia, 1989), 29Google Scholar.
14. Glucksmann, Women on the Line, 7.
15. Gordon, Avery, Ghostly Matters (Minneapolis and London, 2008), 22Google Scholar in Carol Smart, “Disciplined Writing: On the Problem of Writing Sociologically,” Working paper #13; Realities (Manchester, 2010), 5.
16. Smart, “Disciplined writing”.
17. Beechey, 25.
18. Marx Ferree, “Book Review”, 447.
19. Back, Les, The Art of Listening (Oxford, 2007), 165Google Scholar.
20. Smith, Andrew, Book Review, Work, Employment and Society, 23 (2009), 803CrossRefGoogle Scholar.