Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:43:07.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilisation of Wild Gramineous Plants for Management of Cereal Stemborers in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Z. R. Khan ,
P. Chiliswa ,
K. Ampong-Nyarko ,
L. E. Smart ,
A. Polaszek ,
J. Wandera  and
M. A. Mulaa
Z. R. Khan
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
P. Chiliswa
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
K. Ampong-Nyarko
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
L. E. Smart
Affiliation:
IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK
A. Polaszek
Affiliation:
International Institute of Entomology, 56 Queen's Gate, London SW7 5JR, UK
J. Wandera
Affiliation:
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 450, Kitale, Kenya
M. A. Mulaa
Affiliation:
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 450, Kitale, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Field trials in Kenya demonstrated that the forage grass, Sorghum vulgare sudanense (Sudan grass) attracted greater oviposition by stemborers than cultivated maize, resulting in significant increase in maize yield. On the other hand, the non-host forage plant, Melinis minutiflora (molasses grass), when inter-cropped with maize, repelled gravid stemborer females from ovipositing on maize, resulting in significant reduction in stemborer infestation. Using these trap- and repellent gramineous plants, a novel pest management approach based on a ‘push-pull’ or stimulo-deterrent diversionary strategy is being developed where stemborers are repelled from the food crop and are simultaneously attracted to a discard or trap crop. The plant composition and permanence of habitat surrounding maize fields also influence the abundance of natural enemies that invade agroecosy stems once a pest population is present. It may be advantageous to promote the growth of native Gramineae and other wild plants which minimise, or even suppress, population growth of pests during non-cropping seasons, but still provide a suitable habitat for natural enemies.

Résumé

Des essais de terrain au Kenya ont prouvé que l'herbe fourragère, Sorghum vulgare sudanense (herbe du Soudan) attirait plus de foreurs de tiges pour la ponte que le maïs cultivé, entraînant une augmentation significative de la récolte de maïs. D'autre part, la plante fourragère non-hôte, Melinis minutiflora (herbe mélasse), une fois en culture mixte avec le maïs, empêchait des foreurs de tiges femelles gravides de pondre sur le maïs, ce qui réduisait significativement l'infestation du maïs par les foreurs de tiges. L'utilisation de ces plantes graminées pièges et répulsives, une approche nouvelle du contrôle des ravageurs basée sur une strategie diversionniste de ‘pousse-tire’ ou de ‘stimulation-deterrence’ est en train d'être dévelopée là où les foreurs de tiges sont repoussés loin des cultures de consommation et sont simultanément attirés vers une plante rebut ou piège. La composition botanique et la permanence de l'habitat entourant les champs de maïs influencent aussi l'abondance des ennemis naturels qui envahissent des agroécosystèmes dès qu'une population de ravageurs est présente. Il serait avantageux de promouvoir la croissance des graminées indigènes et d'autres plantes sauvages qui minimisent ou même inhibent la croissance des populations des ravageurs durant les saisons de jachère, tout en assurant un habitat favorable pour les ennemis naturels.

Keywords

habitat managementwild hoststrap plantsalternate hostsgestion de l'habitathôtes sauvagesplantes piègeshôtes de rechange
Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 17 , Special Issue 1: Ecology and Management of Tropical Gramineous Stemborers , March 1997 , pp. 143 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altieri, M. A. (1981) Weeds may augment biological control of insects. Calif. Agric. 35, 22–24.Google Scholar
Altieri, M. A. (1991) Increasing biodiversity to improve insect pest management in agro-ecosystems, pp. 157–162. In Biodiversity of Microorganisms and Invertebrates: Its Role in Sustainable Agriculture (Edited by Hawksworth, D. L.). Proceedings of the First Workshop on the Ecological Foundations of Sustainable Agriculture, London, U. K., 26–27 July 1990. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Altieri, M. A. and Letourneau, D. K. (1984) Vegetation diversity and outbreaks of insect pests. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2, 131–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altieri, M. A. and Whitcomb, W. H. (1979) The potential use of weeds in the manipulation of beneficial insects. HortSience 14, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altieri, M. A., van Schoonhoven, A. and Doll, J. (1977) The ecological role of weeds in insect pest management systems: A review illustrated with bea. (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cropping system. PANS 24, 185–206.Google Scholar
Ampofo, J. K. O. (1986) Maize stalk borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) damage and plant resistance. Environ. Entomol. 15, 1124–1129.Google Scholar
Boonman, J. G. (1992) Tropical grasses from the East African Centre of Biodiversity. Biotechnology and Development Monitor 11, 9–10.Google Scholar
Bowden, J. (1976) Stem borer ecology and strategy for control. Ann. Appl. Biol. 84, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, P. and Fry, G. L. A. (1992) Field margins: Can they enhance natural enemy population densities and general arthropod diversity on farmland. Ague. Ecosyst. Environ. 40, 1–4, 95–115.Google Scholar
Harris, K. M. (1990) Bioecology o. Chilo species. Insect Sci. Applic. 11, 467–477.Google Scholar
Herzog, D. C. and Funderburk, J. E. (1986) Ecological bases for habitat management and pest cultural control, pp. 217–250. In Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management Practice (Edited by Kogan, M.). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hutter, N. J. (1996) An assessment of the potential value of ten varieties of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) with respect to their use as a trap crop for the spotted stem borer (Chilo partellus) attacking maize (Zea mays). MSc Thesis in Tropical Agriculture and Environmental Science, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of NewCastle-upon-Tyne, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, K. M. and Kabuye, C. H. S. (1987) An Illustrated Manual of Kenya Grasses. FAO, Rome. 765 pp.Google Scholar
Ingram, W. R. (1958) The lepidopterous stalk borers associated with Graminae in Uganda. Bull. Entomol. Res. 49, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. J. V. (1976) Insect flight in relation to problems of pest control, pp. 135–155. In Insect Flight (Edited by Rainey, R. C.). Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Khan, Z. R., Ampong-Nyarko, K., Chiliswa, P., Hassanali, A., Kimani, S., Lwande, W., Overholt, W. A., Pickett, J. A., Smart, L. E., Wadhams, L. J. and Woodcock, C. M. (1997) Intercropping increases parasitism of pests. Nature (London) 388, 631–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mally, C. W. (1920) The maize stalk borer: Busseolafusca Fuller. Department of Agriculture, Union of South Africa, Bulletin no. 3. Cape Times Limited, Government Printers. III pp.Google Scholar
Mwangi, E. N.; Essuman, S.; Kaaya, G. P.; Nyandat, E.; Munyinyi, D. and Kimondo, M. G. (1995) Repellency of the tic. Khipicephalus appendiculatus by the grass Melinis minutiflora. Trop. Anim. Hlth Prod. 27, 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W. (1986) Enhancing parasite activity in crops, pp. 319–340. In Insect Parasitoids (Edited by Waage, J. and Greathead, D.). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Price, P. W. (1976) Colonization of crops by arthropods: nonequilibrium communities in soybean fields. Environ. Entomol. 5, 824–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulthess, F., Bosque-Perez, N. A., Chabi-Olaye, A., Gounou, S., Ndemah, R. and Goergen, G. (1997) Exchange of natural enemies of lepidopteran cereal stemborers between African regions. Insect Sci. Applic. 17, 97–108 (this issue).Google Scholar
Seshu Reddy, K. V. (1983) Studies on the stem borer complex of sorghum in Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 3–10.Google Scholar
Seshu Reddy, K. V. and Sum, K. O. S. (1992) Yield-infestation relationship and determination of economic injury level of the stem borer. Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in three varieties of maize, Zea mays L. Maydica 37, 371–376.Google Scholar
Smart, L. E., Stevenson, J. H. and Walters, J. H. H. (1989) Development of field trial methodology to assess short-term effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods in arable crops. Crop Protection 8, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. C., Roa, E. and Romero, N. (1978) Anti-tick grasses as the basis for developing practical tropical tick control packages. Trop. Anim. Hlth Prod. 10, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usua, E. J. (1968) The biology o. Busseola fusca and Sesamia species in south-western Nigeria: Distribution and population studies. J. Econ. Entomol. 61, 830–833.Google Scholar
van Emden, H. F. and Way, M. J. (1971) Host plants in the population dynamics of insects, pp. 181–199. In Insect/Plant Relationships (Edited by van Emden, H. F.). Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
van Emden, H. F. and Dabrowski, Z. T. (1994) Biodiversity and habitat modification in pest management. Insect Sci. Applic. 15, 605–620.Google Scholar
Waage, J. (1991) Biological control and biodiversity. Biology Education 8, 63–70.Google Scholar
Watt, A. D. (1981) Wild grasses and grain aphid (Sitobion avenae), pp. 222–229. In Pests, Pathogens, and Vegetation (Edited by Tresh, J. M.). Pitman, London.Google Scholar