Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:59:45.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of permethrin-impregnated wall cloth (Mbu cloth) for control of vectors of malaria and leishmaniases in Kenya — I. Effect on mosquito populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Mutuku J. Mutinga ,
Clifford M. Mutero ,
Mulenda Basimike  and
Augustine M. Ngindu
Mutuku J. Mutinga
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Clifford M. Mutero
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Mulenda Basimike
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Augustine M. Ngindu
Affiliation:
Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 20750, Nairobi
Get access

Abstract

The impact of a new design of permethrin-impregnated wall cloth (“Mbu” (mosquito) cloth) on mosquito populations was assessed in Marigat area of Baringo District, Kenya. The cloth was fitted in 2000 houses. Mosquito relative density, species composition and the proportion of blood-fed females before and during the use of the Mbu cloth were monitored by hand catch, exit trap and CDC light trap catches. The common mosquito species were Culex quinquefasciatus, Mansonia uniformis, Anopheles gambiae sensu lato and An. funestus. A statistically significant decline in the mosquito population was observed following the introduction of the cloth. The decline was particularly high during the first and second six month impregnation cycles when it ranged between 43 and 94% indoors. C. quinquefasciatus was less affected by the cloth than other species, while M. uniformis apparently avoided treated houses. An. gambiae s.I. and An. funestus were collected in extremely low numbers during the post-treatment period. The Mbu cloth and other permethrin impregnated wall-hanging fabrics constitute a novel way Of controlling mosquitoes and malaria in rural communities.

Résumé

L'effet d'un nouveau modèle d'écran traité à la permethrine (“Mbu” (moustique) cloth) sur les populations des moustiques a été évalué dans la localité de Marigat, District de Baringo au Kenya. Les écrans ónt été fixes dans 2000 maisons. La densité relative des moustiques, la composition spécifique et la proportion des femelles nourries au sang avant et pendant l'emploi d'écran étaient régulièrément surveillées en utilisant la technique de capture à la main, le piège fenétre, et le piège lumineux (CDC). Les espèces de moustiques les plus rencontrées étaient Culex quinquefasciatus, Mansonia uniformis, Anopheles gambiae s.I. et An. funestus. Une reduction statistiquement significative des populations de moustiques était observée après l'introduction d'écran. Elle était particulièrement élevée pendant le premier et le second cycles de traitement. Cette reduction se rangeait entre 43 et 94% (à l'intérieur des maisons). C. quinquefasciatus était moins affecté par l'écran, alors que M. uniformis apparamment évitait les maisons traitées. An. gambiae s.I. et An. funestus ont été extremment peu attrapés pendant la période d'après traitement. L'écran (Mbu cloth) et autres matériaux impregnés à la permethrine constituent un nouveau moyen pour controller les moustiques et le paludisme dans les communautés rurales.

Keywords

Permethrin-impregnated (Mbu) clothmosquitoesAnopheles gambiae s.l.malariaCulex quinquefasciatusBaringoKenyaEcran traité à la permethrine (Mbu cloth)moustiques. Anopheles gambiae s.I.paludismeCulex quinquefasciatusBaringoKenya
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 151 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aniedu, I., Mutinga, M. J. and Mutero, C. M. (1989) Age composition and survival rate of Anopheles gambiae Giles complex. (Diptera: culicidae) in Baringo District, Kenya. J. Appl. Entomol. 107, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, C. F. and Lines, J. D. (1985) Impregnated fabrics against malaria mosquitoes. Parasitology Today 1, 147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F., Lines, J. D., Carnevale, P., Robert, V., Boudin, C., Halna, J. M., Pazart, L., Gazin, P., Richard, A., Mouchet, J., Charlwood, J. D., Graves, P. M., Hossain, M. I., Kurihara, T., Ichimori, K., Zuzi, L., Baolin, L., Majori, G., Sabatinelli, G., Coluzzi, M., Njunwa, K. J., Wilkes, T. J., Snow, R. J. and Lindsay, S. W. (1990) Impregnated bednets and curtains against malaria mosquitoes. In Appropriate Technology in Vector Control (Edited by Curtis, C. F.), pp. 233. CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. I. and Curtis, C. F. (1989) Assays of permethrin-impregnated fabrics and bioassays with mosquitoes (Diptera: culicidae). Bull. entomol. Res. 79, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lines, J. D., Myamba, J. and Curtis, C. F. (1987) Experimental hut trials of permethrin-impregnated nets and curtains against malaria vectors in Tanzania. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1, 37–51.Google Scholar
Lines, J. D., Curtis, C. F., Wilkes, T. J. and Njunwa, K. J. (1991) Monitoring human-biting mosquitoes (Diptera: culicidae) in Tanzania with light-traps hung beside mosquito nets. Bull, entomol. Res. 81, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormack, C. P. and Snow, R. W. (1986) Gambian cultural preferences in the use of insecticide treated bed nets. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 89, 295–302.Google Scholar
Magesa, S. M., Wilkes, T. J., Mnzava, A. E. P, Njunwa, K. J., Nyamba, J., Phillip, M. D., Hill, N., Lines, J. D. and Curtis, C. F. (1991) Trial of pyrethroid treated bednets in an area of Tanzania holoendemic for malaria. Part 2: Effects on the malaria vector population. Acta Tropica. 49, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutero, C. M. and Birley, M. H. (1987) Estimation of the survival rate and oviposition cycle of field populations of malaria vectors in Kenya. J. Appl. Ecol. 24, 853–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njunwa, K. J., Lines, J. D., Magesa, S. M., Mnzava, A. E. P, Wilkes, T. J., Alilio, M., Kivumbi, K. and Curtis, C. F. (1991) Trial of pyrethroid impregnated bednets in an area of Tanzania holoendemic for malaria. Part 1. Operational methods and acceptability. Acta Tropica 49, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quelennec, G. (1988) Pyrethroids in the WHO pesticide evaluation scheme (WHOPES). Parasitology Today 4, 15–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozendaal, J. A. and Curtis, C. F. (1989) Recent research on impregnated mosquito nets. J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc. 5, 500–507.Google Scholar
SAS (1987) SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. Version 6 edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Service, M. W. (1976) Mosquito Ecology. Field Sampling Methods. Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Snow, R. W., Rowan, K. M. and Greenwood, B. M. (1987) A trial of permethrin-treated bednets in the prevention of malaria in Gambian children. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 81, 563–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. B. (1974) Anopheles gambiae complex and disease transmission in Africa. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 68, 278–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (1975) Manual onPractical Entomology in Malaria. Part II. Methods and Techniques. (WHO offset publication No. 13). World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
WHO (1987) Tropical Disease Research: A global partnership. Eighth Programme Report of the UNDP/WorldBank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR). World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Zuzi, L., Mancheng, Z., Yuguang, W., Binglin, Z., Guangyu, L. and Hui, H. (1989) Trial of deltamethrin impregnated bednets for the control of malaria transmitted by Anopheles sinensis and Anopheles anthropophagus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 40, 356–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar