Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:40:33.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some barriers to Trypanosoma congolense development in Glossina morsitans morsitans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

M. I. Mwangelwa
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi
L. H. Otieno
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi
G. D. F. Reid
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi
Get access

Abstract

The effect of fly age, sex, and period of starvation on the uptake and development of Trypanosoma congolense infection was examined in Glossina morsitans morsitans. In a study consisting of 1739 specimens of various ages, young unfed 16-hr-old flies and 2-day-old starved flies developed significantly higher mature infections than 2-day-old and 7-day-old flies which had been fed previously on a clean blood meal. Females displayed significantly higher immature infections, while mature infections were recorded more frequently in males, suggesting that females possess a stronger barrier to trypanosome development. The possible factors involved are discussed.

Résumé

L'effet de läge, du sexe et de la durée de carence alimentaire chez la mouche tsétsé sur la capture et le développement de l'infection a Trypanosoma congolense a été examine chez Glossina morsitans morsitans. Dans une étude portant sur 1739 specimens de divers âges, de jeunes mouches non alimentées vieilles de 16 heures et de mouches carenćees alimentairement vieilles de 2 jours développent significativement des infections hautement matures que des mouches vieilles de 2 jours et de 7 jours qui ont été nourries préalablement sur un repas sanguin propre. Les femelles developpent des infections hautement immatures alors que des infections matures etaient observées plus fréquemment chez les males suggerant que les femelles possedent une resistance plus forte au developpement de trypanosome. On examine ici les facteurs pertinents.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burtt, E. (1946) The sex ratio of infected flies found in transmission experiments with Glossina morsitans morsitans and Trypanosoma rhodesiense. Ann. trop. med. Parasit. 40, 7479.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1955) The natural history of tsetse flies. An account of the genus Glossina (Diptera). Mem. London Sch. Hyg. trop. Med. No. 10. 816 pp.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. (1969) Trypanosome infection in the mouthparts of Zambian tsetse flies. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 63, 1534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Distelmans, W., D'haeselear, F., Kaufman, L. and Roussew, P. (1982) The susceptibility of Glossina palpalis palpalis at different ages to infection with Trypanosoma congolense. Ann. Soc. beige Med. trop. 16, 4147.Google Scholar
Duke, L. H. (1933) Relative susceptibility of the sexes of Glossina to infection with trypanosomes. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 27, 355356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbairn, H. and Culwick, A. T. (1950) The transmission of the polymorphic trypanosomes. Acta trop. 1, 1944.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. and Yates, F. (1963) Statistical Tables for Biological Agricultural and Medical Research, Longman, 146 pp.Google Scholar
Gingrich, J. B., Ward, R. A., Macken, L. M. and Esser, K. M. (1982a) African sleeping sickness; new evidence that mature flies (Glossina morsitans ) can become potent vectors. Trans R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 76, 479481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gingrich, J. B., Ward, R. A., Macken, L. M. and Schoenbechler, (1982b) Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (Trypanosomatidae): factors influencing rates of a recent human isolate in the tsetse Glossina morsitans (Diptera: Glossinidae). J. Med. Entomol. 19, 268274.Google Scholar
Harley, J. M. B. (1971) The influence of the age of the fly at the time of infecting feed on infection of Glossina fuscipes with Trypanosoma rhodesiense. Ann. trop. med. Parasit. 65, 191196.Google Scholar
Hoof Van, L., Henrad, C. and Peel, E. (1937) Influences modificatrices de la transmissibilite cyclique du Trypanosoma gambiense par Glossina palpalis. Ann. Soc. beige med. trop. 17, 249263.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. H. N. (1946) An artificially isolated generation of tsetse flies (Diptera). Bull. ent. Res. 37, 291299.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. M. (1974) Recent developments in the ecology and methods of control of tsetse flies (Glossina spp: Diptera, Glossinidae)—a review. Bull. ent. Res. 63, 361399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maudlin, I. (1985) Inheritance of susceptibility to trypanosomes in tsetse flies. Parasitol. Today 1, 5960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maudlin, I. and Dukes, P. (1985) Extrachromosomal inheritance of susceptibility to trypanosome infection in tsetse flies I. Selection of susceptible and refractory lines of Glossina morsitans morsitans. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 79, 317324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maudlin, I., Kabayo, J. P., Flood, M. E. T. and Evans, D. A. (1984) Serum factors and the maturation of Trypanosoma congolense infections in Glossina morsitans. Z. Parasitenkd 70, 1119.Google Scholar
Moloo, S. K., Steiger, R. F., and Brun, R. (1973) Trypanosome infection rates in Glossina swynnertoni and G. pallidipes in Ikoma, Musoma District, Tanzania. Parasitology 66, 259267.Google Scholar
Molyneux, D. H. (1977) Vector relationship in the trypanosomatidae. Ad. Parasit. 15, 182.Google Scholar
Otieno, L. H., Darji, N., Onyango, P. and Mpanga, E. (1983) Some observations on factors associated with the development of Trypanosoma brucei brucei infections in Glossina morsitans morsitans. Ada trap. 40, 113120.Google ScholarPubMed
Wijers, D. J. B. (1958) Factors that may influence the infection rate of Glossina palpalis with Trypanosoma gambiense I: the age of the fly at the time of the infected feed. Ann. trop. Parasit. 52, 385390.Google Scholar