Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:55:33.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separation of Agromyzidae species and populations associated with legumes using discriminant analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Beatrice Tengecho Chemengich
Beatrice Tengecho Chemengich
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi
Get access

Abstract

Agromyzidae populations occurring in legumes in Kenya were tested for speciation at host-type level and at the species level using discriminant analysis. Measurements were taken of various morphological characters of five populations of Chromatomyia horticola from five host plants and of seven male and female agromyzid species. The ratio of the proximal to the distal part of the wing vein, (M3+4) provided the best discrimination for five host populations of C. horticola; the species was separated into two distinct groups by this character. Females of Ophiomyia spencerella and O. phaseoli were distinct. However, overlap existed in male O. spencerella, O. phaseoli and C. horticola. In addition, there was overlap in female O. phaseoli, Tropicomyia vigneae and Liriomyza trifolii. The best discrimination in the male populations was obtained using the ratio of the proximal to the distal part of wing vein (M3+4). In the female populations, the best discriminating character was hind tibia length.

Résumé

Les populations d'agromyzidés rencontrés au sein des légumineuses au Kenya ont été soumises à une analyse discriminatoire pour tester l'affinité des espèces et leurs plantes-hôtes. Divers caractères morphologiques ont été mesurés sur cinq populations de Chromatomyia horticola provenant de cinq plantes-hôtes, et sur sept espèces d'agromyzidés mâles et femelles. Le rapport des mensurations de la partie proximale à la partie distale de la nervure alaire, (M3+4) donnait la meilleure discrimination pour cinq populations provenant des plantes-hôtes de C. horticola, et l'espèce fut divisée en deux groupes distincts suivant ce caractère. Les femelles d' Ophiomyia spencerella et celles d'O. phaseoli étaient distinctes. Cependant un chevauchement existait au sein des mâles d'O. spencerella, d'O. phaseoli et C. horticola. De plus, le même chevauchement était observé au sein des femelles d'O. phaseoli, de Tropicomyia vigneae et de Liriomyza trifolii. La meilleure discrimination au sein des populations mâles était obtenue par utilisation du rapport des mensurations de la partie proximale à la partie distale de la nervure alaire (M3+4). Pour les populations femelles, le meilleur caractère discriminatoire fut la longueur du tibia de la patte postérieure.

Keywords

morphometricsdiscriminant analysislegumesAgromyzidaemesures morphométriquesanalyse discriminatoirelégumineusesAgromyzidae
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 67 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atchley, W. R. (1974) Morphometric differences in chromosomally characterised parapatric races of morabine grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Eumastacidae). Aust. J. Zool. 22, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagine, R. K. N. (1986) Biosystematic studies of the termite genus Odontotermes (Holmgren) with special reference to Kenya. A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Makerere University.Google Scholar
Coetzee, M. (1989) Comparative morphology and multivariate analysis for discrimination of four members of Anopheles gambiae group in Southern Africa. Mosquito-Systematics 21, 100–116. Univ. of Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Daly, H. V. (1985) Insect morphometrics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 30, 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. G. (1981) Information theory and character selection in the numerical taxonomy of some male Diaspididae (Hemiptera: Coccoidea). Entom. 6, 149–178.Google Scholar
Dent, D. R. (1983) The biology and host plant relationships of the grass aphid Metopolophium festucae (Theobald) subspecies cerealium. PhD Thesis Southhampton University.Google Scholar
Donnell, D. J. and Mackaurer, M. (1989) A morphological and taxonomic study of first larvae of aphiniinae (Hymenoptera:Braconidae). System. Entom. 14, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyen, T. J. and Tschinkel, W. R. (1982) Phenetic and cladistic relationships among tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera). Syst. Entom. 7, 127–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrman, L. (1965) Direct observation of sexual isolating between allopatric and between sympatric strains of different Drosophila paulistonum races. Evolution 19, 459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmes, G. W. (1978) A morphometric comparison of three closely related species of Myrmica (Formicidae), including a new species from England. Syst. Entom. 3, 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frances, J. C. and McCulloch, C. E. (1990) Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora's Box? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 129–166.Google Scholar
Frick, K. E. (1951) Liriomyza langei, a new species of leafminer of economic importance in California. Pan-Pacific Ent. 21, 81.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G. C. D. (1955) A new British species of Agromyzidae (Diptera). Entomologists' Gaz. 6, 10–12.Google Scholar
Gould (1970) Coincidence of climatic and faunal fluctuations in pleistocene Bermuda. Science 168, 572–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, S. I., Wood, T. K. and Karlin, A. A. (1981) Genetic differentiation along host plant line in the sympatric Enchenopa binotata Say complex (Homoptera: Membracidae). Evolution 35, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. C., Brown, B. W. and Cook, C. F. (1966) A quantitative taxonomie study of the Hoplopleura hesperomydis complex (Anoplura, Hoplopluridae) with notes on aposteriori taxonomie characters. Syst. Zool. 15, 24–45.Google Scholar
Kim, K. C., Chiang, H. C. and Brown, B. W. (1967) Morphometric differences among four biotypes of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 60, 796–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiecka, W. R. (1975) Discriminant analysis, pp. 434–467. In Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences, 2nd edit. (Edited by Nie, N. H., Hill, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. and Brent, D. H.). McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Kuroda, M. (1954) Three new species and a new subspecies of agromyzid flies from Japan. Kont'yu, 21, 76–83.Google Scholar
Liquido, N. (1978) Morphology, cytology and breeding behaviour of Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.) (Delphacidae: Homoptera). Unpublished MSc thesis, University of the Philippines at Los Baños College, Laguna.Google Scholar
Mason, L. G., Ehrlich, P. R. and Emmel, T. C. (1968) The population biology of the butterfly Euphydryas editha VI. Phenetics of the Jasper Ridge colony, 1965–1966. Evolution 22, 46–54.Google Scholar
McNeil, J. N. (1978) The number of larval stages of Tymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in eastern Canada. Can. Entomol. 110, 1293–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowakowski, J. T. (1958) Studies on mining flies (Diptera, Agromyzidae). A new spedes of Phytomyza Fall, in Pulsatilla Mill. Ann. Zool, Warsz 17, 11–28.Google Scholar
Nowakowski, J. T. (1972) Zweite Vorläufige Mitteilung zu einer Monographie der europäischen Arten der Gattung Cerodontha Rond. (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Polskie Pismo Ent. 42, 735–765.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. A. and Meyer, J. R. (1990) Discriminant models for predicting risk of blueberry, XL Maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae) infestations in southeastern North Carolina, J. Econ. Entomol. 83, 526–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, W. M. (1974) Taxonomy, feeding preferences and general ecology of certain chrysomelid beetles. PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
Plowright, R. C. and Stephen, W. W. (1973) (Bee wings)— A numerical taxonomie analysis of the evolutionary relationships of Bombus and Psithyrus (Apidae: Hymenoptera). Can. Entomol. 105, 733–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renou, M., Lalanne-Cassou, B., Michelot, D., Gordon, G. and Dore, J. C. (1988) Multivariate analysis of the correlation between Noctuidae subfamilies and the chemical structure of their sex pheromones or male attractants. J. Chem. Ecol. 14, 1187–1215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinderer, T. E. (1988) Computer assisted identification of hybrid strains of western honey bees. Florida-Entomologist 71, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinkel, R. C. (1965) Microgeographic variation and covariation in Pemphigus populi-transversus. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 46, 167–200.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (1985) SAS User's Guide: Statistics, version 5 ed.SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. (1990) Morphometrics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasakawa, M. (1953) Descriptions and records of dipterous leafminers from Japan (Agromyzidae). I Scient. Rep. Ssaikyo Univ. Agric. 4, 9–22.Google Scholar
Saxena, R. C. and Rueda, L. M. (1982) Morphological variations among three biotypes of the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens in the Philippines. Insect Sci. Applic. 3, 193–210.Google Scholar
Sluss, T. P., Graham, H. M. and Sluss, E. S. (1982) Morphometric, allozyme and hybridization comparisons of four Lygus species (Hemiptera: Miridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 75, 448–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Thomas, P. A. (1965) Geographic variation of Pempigus Populi-transversus in Eastern North America: Stem Mothers and new data on alates. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 46, 201–252.Google Scholar
Spencer, K. A. (1954) Notes on the British Agromyzidae (Dipt.)—111. Entomologists Mon. Mag. 90, 217–218.Google Scholar
Spencer, K. A. (1973) Agromyzidae (Diptera) of economic importance. Series Entomologica 9, 1–418. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
Spencer, K. A. (1990) Host specialization in the world. Agromyzidae (Diptera) with illustration by Ann Spencer. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 444 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. A. (1968) Geographic variation of the rabbit tick, Haemaphysalis leporispalustris in North America. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 47, 787–828.Google Scholar
Woodford, J. A. T. and Lerman, P. M. (1977) The effects of genotype, environment, age and morph on morphological variation in alate Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bull. Entom. Res. 67, 685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yusof, M. O. (1982) Biological and taxonomie studies on some leafhopper pests of rice in Southeast Asia. PhD Thesis, Univesity of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar