Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:08:09.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Chilo partellus larvae to host plant materials: Behaviour and electrophysiological bioassay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

S. M. Waladde ,
S. A. Ochieng  and
H. M. Kahoro
S. M. Waladde
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
S. A. Ochieng
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
H. M. Kahoro
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

A bioassay was developed to assess the in vitro feeding responses of Chilo partellus larvae to susceptible (Inbred A) and resistant (MP 704) maize varieties. Consumption of internode tissues from the two maize varieties differed while the reverse was true for the nodes. Aqueous extracts from the two varieties caused a decrease in feeding and weight gain, but these effects were more evident in MP 704 than in Inbred A treatments. This suggests that MP 704 has a water extractable factor affecting weight gain negatively. Dose-response curves of neural responses from the maxillary styloconica sensilla showed that aqueous extracts from the two maize varieties evoked different functional forms of impulse frequencies especially in the lateral sensilla. These observations suggest that the quality of gustatory stimuli in the two maize varieties differs.

Résumé

Un test in vitro fut develope pour examiner le comportement nutritionnel des larves de Chilo partellus sur deux varietes de mais (“Inbred A”, sensible; “MP 704”, resistante). La consomation du tissus vegetale des deux varietes de mais est differente, tandis que ceci nest pas vrais pour le tissu nodal. Les extraits en solution aqueuse des deux varietes de mais causent une reduction de nourissement et du taux de croissance, et ces effets sont plus evident avec les extraits de MP 704 qu avec ceux de Inbred A. Cela demontre que MP 704 contient un facteur de retention deau qui reduit le taux de croissance. Les extraits en solution aqueuse des diverses varietes de mais se caracterisent par des variations de frequence sur les courbes de reponses des sensilles laterales. Les observations demontrent que la qualite de stimulation gustatif des deux varietes de mais est differente.

Keywords

Chilo partellusin vitro feeding bioassayLepidopterataste sensillaelectrophysiologysusceptible maize varietiesresistant maize varietiesChilo partellustestnutritionnel in vitroLepidopterasensilles gustatires.electrophysiologievariete de mais sensiblevariete de mais resistante
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 79 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ampofo, J. K. O. (1986) Effect of resistant maize cultivars on larval dispersal and establishment of Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insect Sci. Applic. 7, 103–106.Google Scholar
Ampofo, J. K. O. and Kidiavai, E. L. (1987) Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidotera: Pyralidae) larval movement and growth on maize plants in relation to plant age and resistance or susceptibility, J. appl. Entomol. 103, 483–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ampofo, J. K. O. and Nyangiri, E. O. (1986) Maize resistance to Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Behavior of newly hatched larvae and movement from oviposition sites to feeding sites. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 21, 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ampofo, J. K. O., Saxena, K. N., Kibuka, J. G. and Nyangiri, E.O. (1986) Evaluation of some maize cultivars for resistance to the stem borer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Western Kenya. Maydica XXXI, 379–389.Google Scholar
Bernays, E. A. and Chapman, R. F. (1975) The importance of chemical inhibition of feeding in host plant selection by Chorthippus parallelus (Zetterstedt). Acrida 4, 83–93.Google Scholar
Bernays, E. A., Chapman, R. F. and Woodhead, S. (1983) Behaviour of newly hatched larvae of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) associated with their establishment on the host plant, sorghum. Bull. entomol. Res. 73, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. F. (1977) The role of the leaf surface in food selection by acridids and other insects. Collo. Inter, du C.R.R.S. Paris No. 265, 133–149.Google Scholar
Chatterji, S. M., Bhambunkar, W. M., Marwaha, K. K., Panwar, V.P.S., Siddiqui, K.R. and Young, W.R. (1971) Relative susceptibility of some promising exotic material to Chilo zonellus (Swinhoe) under artificial infestation. Ind. J. Entomol. 33, 209–213.Google Scholar
Hanson, F. E. and Dethier, V. G. (1973) The role of gustation and olfaction in food plant discrimination and induction of preferences in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. J. Insect Physiol. 19, 1019–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, E. S., Lettvin, J. Y. and Roeder, K. D. (1955) Physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit. Science 122, 417–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, W. C. (1972) Dynamics of feeding responses in Pieris brassicae Linn. as a function of chemosensory input: A behavioural, ultrastructural and electrophysiological study. Meded. Landbouwhogesch. Wageningen. 72, 11.Google Scholar
Ma, W. C. (1976) Experimental observations of food-aversive responses of Spodoptera exempta (Wlk). (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull. entomol. Res. 66, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathez, F. C. (1972) Chilo partellus (Swinhoe), Chilo orichalcociliella Strand (Lep., Crambidae) and Sesamia calamistis Hmps (Lep., Noctuidae) on maize in the Coast Province, Kenya. Mitt. Schweiz. Ent. Ges. 45, 267–289.Google Scholar
Ochieng, R. S., Onyango, F. O. and Bungu, M. D. O. (1985) Improvement of techniques for mass culture of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in sorghum. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 407–413.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. F., Klun, T. A. and Brindley, W. B. (1978) European corn borer; a non-preference mechanism of leaf feeding resistance and its relationship to 1, 4-benzoxazin-3-one concentration in dent corn tissue. J. econ. Entomol. 71, 461–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roome, R. E. (1980) Dispersal of newly hatched Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) larvae from sorghum cultivars. J. appl. Entomol. 90, 174–180.Google Scholar
Roome, R. E., Chandha, G. K. and Padgam, D. (1977) Choice of oviposition site by Chilo, the sorghum stem borer. Bull. SROP. (1977) 115–121.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, L. M. (1986) What makes a caterpillar eat? The sensory code underlying feeding behaviour. In Perspectives in Chemoreception and Behaviour (Edited by Chapman, R. F., Bernays, E. A. and Stoffolano, J. G. Jr)., pp. 67–97. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Scriber, J. M. and Slansky, F. Jr (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. A. Rev. Entomol. 26, 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, P. (1977) Artificial Diet for Insects, Mites and Spiders. IFI/Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slansky, J. R. F. and Scriber, J. M. (1985) Food consumption and utilization. In Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology (Edited by Kerkut, G. A. and Gilbert, L. J.), Vol. 4, pp. 87–163. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Waladde, S. M. (1983) Chemoreception of adult stem-borer: Tarsal and ovipositor sensilla on Chilo partellus and Eldana saccharine. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 159–165.Google Scholar
Woodhead, S. (1983) Surface chemistry of Sorghum bicolor and its importance in feeding by Locusta migratoria. Physiol. Entomol. 8, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhead, S. and Taneja, S. L. (1987) The importance of the behaviour of young larvae in sorghum resistance to Chilo partellus. Entomol. exp. appl. 45, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar