Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:45:19.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistance to insect pest damage in four cotton varieties in Ludhiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

A. K. Chakravarthy
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
A. S. Sidhu
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India
Get access

Abstract

In the field and laboratory, Gossypium arboreum varieties G 27, LD 133 and LD 230 were less preferred by the jassid, Amrasca biguttula biguttula, and the aphid, Aphis gossypii, than G. hirsutum variety, F 414. The arboreum varieties also supported fewer numbers of the two sucking pests than the hirsutum cotton. These varieties proved potentially susceptible to bollworms Earias spp and Pectinophora gossypiella damage in laboratory tests. Interestingly the varieties exhibited considerable degrees of field resistance. In the field, Earias moths showed no preference for any plant part for oviposition among the four cotton varieties. Of the reproductive parts of the cotton plant offered, first and last instar Earias vittella larvae orientated maximally to bud. Nonetheless, the larvae showed no definite pattern of preference for the fruiting structures of the cotton plant. In the laboratory, the four varieties showed non-significant differences in supporting the growth of Earias and Pectinophora larvae. The number of Earias eggs on the four varieties did not vary significantly. The number of fruiting bodies per plant and Earias incidence were unrelated in the four varieties.

Résumé

Dans le champ d'experiméntation, ou au laboratoire, les variétiés de Gossypium arboreum G27, LDI33 et LD 230 étaient moins préférées par le jasside Amrasca bigutula bigutula et l'aphide Aphis gossyipii que la variété G. hirsutum, F414. En outre, les variétés d'arboreum supportait un nombre inférieur de ces deux insectes que le cotton hirsutum. Les variétés susmentionnées se sont avérées potentiellement susceptibles aux dégâts des vers Earias spp et Pectinophora gossypiella au cours des tests de laboratoire, ces variétés ont manifesté un haut dégré de résistance dans les champs à expérimentation. Dans le champ d'expérimentation, les vers Earias, n'ont manifesté aucune préférence pour les plantes quant à l'oviposition parmi les 4 variétés de cotton. Des 4 parties reproductives de la plante de cotton offertes, la premiere la dernière phase des larves de Earias vittella se sont orientées vers le bourgeon en grands nombres. Néamoins, les larves n'ont montré aucune préférence consistante pour les structures de fruits de la plante de cotton. En laboratoire, les 4 variétés n'ont pas montre de différences significatives quant au support de la croissance des larves d'Earias et Pectinophora. Le nombre d'oeufs d'Earias sur les 4 variétés n'a pa varie de façon significative. Il n'y avait pas de rapport entre le nombre de structures des fruits par plante et la fréquence d'Earias chéz les 4 variétés.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Afzal, M. and Ghani, M. A. (1953) Cotton jassid in the Punjab. Sci. Monogr. Pakistan Ass. Adv. Sci. 2, 102.Google Scholar
Agarwal, R. A., Banerjee, S. K., Singh, M. and Katiyar, K. N. (1976) Resistance to insects in cotton. II. To pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.). Cotton Fibres Trop. 31, 217221.Google Scholar
All India Co-ordinated Cotton Improvement Project (19741983) Annual Progress Report (Entomology part). Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, G., Gopalan, M. and Subramaniam, T. R. (1977) Resistance to leafhopper in upland cotton. Indian J. agric. Sci. 47, 8286.Google Scholar
Ballard, E. (1923) Playeara gossypiella (Saund.) the pink bollworm in South India. Mem. Dept Agric. India ent. Ser. 7, 171193.Google Scholar
Beck, S. D. (1965) Resistance of plants to insects. A. Rev. Ent. 10, 207232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. D. (1974) Theoretical aspects of host plant specificity in insects. In Proceedings of a Summer Institute on Biological Control of Plant Insects and Diseases (Edited by Maxwell, F. G. and Harris, F. A.), pp. 290311. University of Mississippi, Jackson.Google Scholar
Bindra, S. S. (1928) Studies on Platyedra gossypiella (Saund.) (Pink bollworm) in the Punjab. Mem. Dept agric. India ent. Ser. 10, 167216.Google Scholar
Chakravarthy, A. K. (1982) Bollworms infestation in relation to the phenology of Arboreum cotton. Ph.D. thesis, p. 165. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.Google Scholar
Chakravarthy, A. K. and Ananda Rao, P. K. (1985) Dispersion patterns, sample unit-sizes and techniques for sampling cotton jassid [Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)] and whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.). Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 661665.Google Scholar
Chakravarthy, A. K. (1985) Distribution patterns, sample-size and sampling Earias spp. on cotton in Ludhiana (Punjab). Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 517520.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T. B. and Misra, C. S. (1920) Cotton bollworms in India. Rep. Proc. 3rd ent. Meet. Pusa 2, 443–172.Google Scholar
Husain, M. A. and Lal, K. B. (1940) The bionomics of Empoasca devastons Distant on some varieties of cotton in the Punjab. Indian J. Ent. 2, 123136.Google Scholar
Jayaswal, A. P., Saini, R. K. and Kairon, M. S. (1981) Incidence of pink bollworm in some promising varieties of upland cotton in Haryana. Indian J. agric. Sci. 57, 577578.Google Scholar
Katiyar, K. N. (1977) Impact of flowering sequence on the incidence of bollworms in different varieties of cotton. Entomologists Newsl. 7, 31.Google Scholar
Katiyar, K. N. (1978) Impact of sequence of flowering on the incidence of bollworms in some varieties of cotton. Indian J. Ent. 39, 324332.Google Scholar
Kaushik, V. K., Rathore, V. S. and Sood, N. K. (1969) Incidence of bollworms and losses caused to cotton in Madhya Pradesh. Indian J. Ent. 31, 175177.Google Scholar
Krishnananda, N. and Agarwal, R. A. (1979) Sources of resistance to jassid, Amrasca devastons (Dist.) in cotton. Indian J. Ent. 41, 177180.Google Scholar
Mathur, B. P. and Bhandari, D. R. (1980) Studies on relative resistance to cotton varieties (Gossypium hirsutum) against jassids (Empoasca devastons Dist.). Pesticides 12, 1819.Google Scholar
Maxwell, F. G., Jenkins, J. N. and Parrott, W. L. (1972) Resistance of plants to insects. Adv. Agron. 24, 187265.Google Scholar
Mehta, R. C. and Saxena, K. N. (1970) Ovipositional responses of the cotton spotted bollworm, Earias fabia (Lepidopter: Noctuidae). Entomologia exp. appl. 13, 1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niles, G. A. (1980) Breeding cotton for resistance to insect pests. In Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects (Edited by Maxwell, F. G. and Jennings, P. R.), p. 651. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Punjab Agricultural University (PAU) (1980) Package of Practices for Kharif Crops of Punjab, p. 188. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.Google Scholar
Singh, H. (1978) Studies on the insect pest infestation in relation to phenology of Arboreum cotton. M.Sc. thesis, p. 54. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.Google Scholar
Singh, J. (1979) Pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) infestation in relation to the phenology of cotton crop. Ph.D. thesis, p. 128. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.Google Scholar
Slosser, J. E., Phillips, J. R. and Heroz, G. A. (1978) Bollworms damage and population development in relation to phenology of the cotton plant. Environ. Ent. 7, 144148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohi, G. S. (1964) Pests of cotton. In Entomology of India, pp. 111134. Entomology Society. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Thimmaiah, G. (1978) Note on the reaction of ‘Varalaxmi,’ ‘Hybrid-4’ and ‘JK-97’ varieties of cotton to bollworm attack with and without plant protection. Indian J. agric. Sci. 48, 627628.Google Scholar