Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:02:50.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships of stemborer damage and plant physical conditions to maize yield in a semi-arid zone of eastern Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Josephine Moraa Songa ,
Zhou Guofa  and
William Allan Overholt
Josephine Moraa Songa
Affiliation:
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), P. O. Box 340, Machakos, Kenya
Zhou Guofa
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
William Allan Overholt
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

A field survey on maize stemborers, stemborer damage, maize plant physical conditions, and maize yield was conducted in eastern Kenya under natural conditions. Chilo partellus was the dominant stemborer accounting for 89.5 % of all borers. Stemborer damage greatly reduced maize yield, with tunnel lengths greater than 20 cm causing a 40 % reduction of potential yield. A 33 % yield loss was found in plants with more than one stemborer exit hole. Each stemborer (at harvest time) was correlated with a 8–10 % yield loss. Good plant physical characteristics significantly increased grain yield. Principle component analysis showed that stemborer damage, plant height and stem diameter were key factors affecting maize grain yield. Regression analysis indicated that one centimetre of stemborer tunnel reduced yield by 3 g/plant. Multiple regression analysis implied a 13.3 ± 1.5 g yield loss (8–10 % of potential yield) due to the damage of a single stemborer. Comparison with average yields in the study area suggested that our results were representative of losses on farmers' fields.

Résumé

Une enquête de terrain a été réalisée, dans l'Est du Kenya en conditions naturelles, sur les foreurs de tiges du maïs, leurs dégâts, les caractéristiques physiques des plants de maïs et les rendements. Chilo partellus est l'espèce de foreur de tiges dominante totalisant 89,5 % de tous les foreurs. Les dégâts occasionnés par les foreurs de tiges réduisent considérablement les rendements du maïs, des galeries de longueur supérieure à 20 cm sont responsables de près de 40% de la réduction de la récolte potentielle. On à trouvé près de 33% de perte de récolte pour les plantes totalisant au moins un trou de sortie de foreur de tiges. De bonnes caractéristiques physiques du maïs augmentent significativement la production de graines. Une analyse en composantes principales montre que les dégâts des foreurs de tiges, la taille de la plante et le diamètre des tiges sont les facteurs clefs affectant la production de graines du maïs. Une analyse de régression simple indique qu'un centimètre de galerie de foreur de tige réduit la production de 3 g/plante. Une analyse de régression multiple suggère une perte de récolte de 13,3 ± 1,5 g (8–10% de la récolte potentielle) due aux dégâts d'un seul foreur de tige. Une comparaison avec les rendements moyens dans la zone étudiée suggère que nos résultats sont représentatifs des pertes observées dans les champs paysans.

Keywords

stemborersChilo partellusyield lossforeurs des tigesChilo partellusperte de rendements
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 243 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, R. G. and Thomas, D. B. (1979) Measurement of soil loss and runoff from simulated rain storms at Kabete, Katumani and Liuni. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Soil Society of East Africa, 25–27 July 1979. Muguga, Kenya.Google Scholar
Barrow, M. R. (1987) The effect of first generation maize stalk borer Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on yield of different maize genotypes, J. Entomol. Soc. S. Afr. 50, 291–298.Google Scholar
la Croix, E. A. S (1967) Maize stalk borer in the Coast Province of Kenya. East Afr. Agric. For. J. 33, 49–54.Google Scholar
FAO (2000) FAOSTAT Agricultural Data, http:// apps.fao.org/Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D., Dicke, F. F. and Neiswander, C. R. (1960) Leaf and sheath feeding resistance to the European corn borer in eight inbred lines of dent corn. Research Bulletin No. 860. Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 38 pp.Google Scholar
Hanway, J. J. (1971) How a corn plant develops. lowa State University Special Report 48. Ames, Iowa, USA. 13 pp.Google Scholar
Hassan, R. M., Corbett, J. D. and Njoroge, K. (1998) Combining geo-referenced survey data with agroclimatic attributes to characterize maize production systems in Kenya, 43–68. In Maize Technology Development and Transfer: A GIS Application for Research Planning in Kenya (Edited by Hassan, R. M.). CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbuvi, J. B. and van de Weg, R. F. (1975) Some preliminary notes on soils of Katumani, Kampi-ya-Mawe, Embu and Muriduko Agricultural Research Stations. Kenya Soil Survey, National Agricultural Laboratories, Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya. No. 25, 13.Google Scholar
Overholt, W. A., Ogedah, K. and Lammers, P. M. (1994) Distribution and sampling of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in maize and sorghum at the Kenya Coast. Bull. Entomol. Res. 84, 367–378.Google Scholar
Seshu Reddy, K. V. (1983) Sorghum stem borers in eastern Africa. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 3–10.Google Scholar
Seshu Reddy, K. V. and Sum, K. O. S (1992) Yieldinfestation relationship and determination of economic injury level of the stem-borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in three varieties of maize, Zea mays L. Maydica 37, 371–376.Google Scholar
Sétamou, M., Schulthess, F., Bosque-Pérez, N. A. and Thomas-Odjo, A. (1995) The effect of stem and cob borers on maize subjected to different nitrogen and silica treatments, with special reference to Sesamia calamistis Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 77, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songa, J. M. (1999) Distribution, importance and management of stemborers (Lepidoptera) in maize production systems of semi-arid eastern Kenya with emphasis on biological control. PhD thesis. Kenyatta University, Nairobi. 251 pp.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. I. and Faught, W. A. (1984) Response farming of maize and beans at Katumani, Machakos District, Kenya: Recommendations, yield expectations, and economic benefits. E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 44, 29–51.Google Scholar
Walker, P. T. (1981) The relation between infestation by lepidopterous stemborers and yield in maize. Eur. Plant Prot. Bull. 11, 101–106.Google Scholar
Warui, C. M. and Kuria, J. N. (1983) Population incidence and the control of maize stalk-borers Chilo partellus (Swinh.) and Chilo orichalcociliellus Strand and Sesamia calamistis Hmps. in Coast Province, Kenya.CrossRefGoogle Scholar