Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:46:31.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population Dynamics of the Stemborers Chilo partellus (Swinhoe), Busseola fusca (Fuller) and Sesamia calamistis Attacking Sorghum in Central Ethiopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Melaku Wale
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Research, P.O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Studies on the population dynamics and species composition of the sorghum stemborers Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Sesamia sp. were conducted at Melkassa, Rift Valley of Ethiopia, during the 1990 and 1992 cropping seasons. Chilo partellus at 92% dominated the species composition. Busseola frisca made up 7.7% and Sesamia calamistis less than 1% of the borers. Occurrence of partellus declined with delay in planting until the third planting ( early June to early July) then increased during late planting in July. Busseola fusca alone, however, tended to increase in numbers with delay in planting. In Melkassa area, early planting in July could be considered as the most suitable, with low borer numbers, damage symptoms and resulting in fewer stalks with peduncle damage. Grain yield was also higher during early planting in July while the lowest yield was obtained during late planting in July. Weather factors showed no consistency but relative humidity seemed to have a significantly negative correlation with insect numbers in the last two plantings in 1992.

Résumé

Au cours des saisons culturales 1990 et 1992, des études sur la dynamique de populations et la prévalence d'espèces foreuses du sorgho, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) et Sesamia sp. ont été conduites à Melkassa dans le Rift valley Ethiopien. De par la prévalence des espèces, Chilo partellus était l'espèce dominante à 92%, suivie de B. fusca avec 7,7%, tandis que Sesamia sp. venait avec moins de 1%. La présence de C. partellus diminuait avec les retards des trois premières dates de semis qui s'étalent de début juin à début juillet, puis sa population montait avec les semis tardifs effectués en fin juillet. Par contre, les populations de B. fusca avaient tendance à augmenter avec les semis tardifs. Dans les conditions de Melkassa, les semis précoces de juillet semblent les mieux indiqués, puisqu'ils occasionnent moins de foreuses et moins de symptômes de dégâts reflétés par un nombre réduit de tiges avec pédoncules endommagés. Des rendements élevés ont également été obtenus des semis précoces de juillet tandis que des récoltes ont été enregistrées pour les semis tardifs de fin juillet. Les facteurs climatiques n'ont pas prouvé de consistance dans leur rôle déterminant mais pour les deux dernières dates de semis de 1992, l'humidité relative semblait avoir une corrélation significativement négative avec le nombre d'insectes.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gebreamlak, A. (1985) Survey of lepidopterous stem borers attacking maize and sorghum in Ethiopia. Ethiopian J. Agrie. Sci. 7, 1526.Google Scholar
Gebreamlak, A., Sigvald, R. and Pettersson, J. (1989) The relationship between sowing date, infestation and damage by the maize stalk borer, Busseola fusca (Noctuidae) on maize in Awasa, Ethiopia. Trop. Pest Manage. 35, 143145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebrekidan, B. (1985) Breeding sorghum for resistance to insects in eastern Africa. Insect Sci. Applic. 6, 351357. 'Google Scholar
Girmay, A., Haile, W., Meles, K. and Tsegaw, S. (1994) Crop pests situation in northwestern Ethiopia, p. 21. In Proceedings of the First Conference of the Crop Protection Society of Ethiopia (CPSE), 14–15 April 1993. CPSE, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Harris, K. M. (1989) Bioecology of sorghum stemborers, pp. 6371. In International Workshop on Stem Borers, 17–20 November 1987, ICRIS AT Centre, Patancheru, A.P. 502 326, India. ICRISAT, India.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, N. R. and Chelliah, S. (1986) Influence of season and weather condition factors, on the occurrence of the sorghum stemborer Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in Tamil Nadu. Trop. Pest Manage. 32, 212214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megenassa, T. (1982) Insect pests of sorghum in Ethiopia, pp. 5464. In Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Sorghum Improvement in Eastern Africa, 17–21 October 1982, Ethiopian Sorghum Improvement Project, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Mulatu, T. and Kefyalew, A. (1991) Labour Use in Major Crop Enterprises in the Nazret Area. Research Report No. 13. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, p. 9.Google Scholar
Sithole, S. Z. (1989) Sorghum stem borers in southern Africa, pp. 4147. In International Workshop on Stem Borers, 17–20 November 1987, ICRISAT Centre, Patancheru, A.P. 502 326, India. ICRISAT, India.Google Scholar
Taneja, S. L. and Leuschner, K. (1985) Methods of rearing, infestation and evaluation for Chilo partellus resistance in sorghum, pp. 175188. In Proceedings of the International Sorghum Entomology Workshop, 15–21 July 1984, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA, Patancheru, A.P. 502 324, India. ICRISAT, India.Google Scholar
Wale, M. and Ayalew, G. (1993) Determination of the relative abundance and dynamics of stalk borer species on sorghum, p. 26. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference: Ethiopian Phytopathological Committee, Committee of'Ethiopian Entomologists, 5–6 March 1992, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Crop Protection Society of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Warui, C. M. and Kuria, J. N. (1983) Population incidence and the control of maize stalk borers Chilo partellus (Swinh.), C. orichalcociliellus Strand and Sesamia calamistis Hmps, in Coast Province, Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 1118.Google Scholar