Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:04:59.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kairomones as pigeonpea resistance factors against Heliothis armigera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Heinz Rembold  and
Hans Tober
Heinz Rembold
Affiliation:
Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, D-8033 Martinsried, nr Munich, FRG
Hans Tober
Affiliation:
Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, D-8033 Martinsried, nr Munich, FRG
Get access

Abstract

The differential attraction by 2 pigeonpea cultivars has been tested through the oviposition behaviour of Heliothis armigera females in a standardized laboratory assay. Seedlings of a susceptible variety (PPE-50) are under choice conditions significantly more attractive at a distance, and without contact allowed other than those of the resistant variety (PPE-45). The volatile signal is contained in the hexane extract from PPE-50 leaves, as shown in the oviposition assay, and after vacuum distillation is present in the more volatile fractions of the mono- and sesquiterpenoids. These compounds, which are also contained in the hexane extracts of 2 more pigeonpea cultivars, a check of medium susceptibility (T-21) and a wild relative (Atylosia scarabaeoides), were compared by capillary gas chromatography. The 4 pigeonpea varieties were characterized by their specific aromagrams, a method which may also advantageously be used in pigeonpea breeding programs.

Résumé

L'attraction différentielle par deux cultivars de petits pois (pigeon pea) a été testée à travers le comportement quant à l'oviposition des Heliothis armigera femelles dans un essai standardizé de laboratoire. Des jeunes plantes d'une variété susceptible (PPE-50) sont considérablement plus attrayants à distance dans des conditions de choix que ceux de la variété résistante (PPE-45). Le signal volatile était contenu dans l'hexane extrait des feuilles du PPE-50 comme il a été montré dans l'essai d'oviposition, et après la distillation à vide il était, présent dans les fractions plus volatiles du mono et sesquiterpenoides. Ces composés qui sont contenus dans les extraits d'hexane de deux cultivars de petits pois supplementaires; un contrôle susceptibilité moyenne (T-21) et une variété sauvage (Atylosia scarabaloides) ont été comparés par Chromatographie capillaire à gas. Les quatre variétés de petits pois étaient charactérisées par leurs aromagrammes spécifiques, une méthode qui peut être employée advantageusement dans les programmes de culture de petits pos (pigeon pea).

Keywords

Heliothis armigeraCajanus cajanpigeonpeakairomoneoviposition attractantaromagramterpenesHeliothis armigeraCajanus cajanpetit pois (pigeon pea)kairomoneovipositionaroma-gramme
Type
Section I: Types and mechanisms of host plant resistance
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 6 , Special Issue 3: Host Plant Resistance and its Significance in Pest Management , June 1985 , pp. 249 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gupta, G. L., Nigam, S. S., Sastry, S. D. and Chakravarti, K. K. (1969) Investigations on the essential oil from Cajanus cajan (Linn) Millsp. Perf. Ess. Oil Rec. 60, 329–336.Google Scholar
Nagarkatti, S. and Prakash, S. (1974) Rearing Heliothis armigera (Hübn.) on artificial diet. Tech. Bull. No. 17, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Bangalore (India), pp. 169–173.Google Scholar
Rembold, H. (1980) Chemical aspects of plant resistance against insects. Trans. Bose Res. Inst. 43, 53–63.Google Scholar
Rembold, H. and Winter, E. (1982) The chemist's role in host-plant resistance studies. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Heliothis Management, 15–20 November 1981, pp. 241–250. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, A.P., India.Google Scholar
Saxena, K. N. and Rembold, H. (1984) Attraction of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) larvae by chickpea seed powder constituents. Z. angew. Ent. 97, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, D. P. and Streibl, M. (1977) Phytosterols, triterpenoid and other lipidic constituents from Cajanus cajan L. Millsp. leaves. Colln. Czech, chem. Commun. 42, 2448–2451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar