Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:04:55.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of maize, cowpea and sorghum intercropping systems on stem-/pod-borer infestations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

B. Amoako-Atta ,
E. O. Omolo  and
E. K. Kidega
B. Amoako-Atta
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
E. O. Omolo
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
E. K. Kidega
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

The paper which covers a two season study from 1981 through 1982, major and minor cropping seasons, describes an improved methodology of sampling for stem-/pod-borer pests within an intercropping farming system involving maize, cowpea and sorghum as target crops. The authors' approach to the intercropping study has been from a holistic angle in an attempt to gain an understanding of the processes which lead to intercropping advantages under the different cropping patterns. The target pests reported were categorized into three trophic levels: firstly, specialist feeders which were Maruca testulalis (Geyer) on cowpea and Atherigona seccata (Rondani) on sorghum; secondly, the relative specialist feeders as Chilo partelhts (Swinh.), Busseola fusca (Fuller), Eldana saccharina (Wlk.) and Sesamia calamistis (Hmps.) on maize and sorghum; and thirdly the generalist feeders represented by Heliothis armigera (Hbn.) which subsists on cowpea, maize and sorghum plants respectively. The entomological data assayed included levels of borer attack on plant spatial and temporal patterns. The population of C. partellus, the dominant stem-borer within the study area was significantly regulated within the intercropping systems. The borer incidence on the maize and sorghum monocrops and the maize/sorghum dicrop was earlier (>14 days after germination, DAG) and accentuated with time, whereas intercropping of the cereals with non cereals caused significant delay (>42 DAG) in the borer colonisation and establishment within the intercropping systems. Incidence of ‘dead hearts’ caused by the borers was significantly higher (P < 0.05) within sorghum than maize stands; a factor related to the significantly higher borer attacks on late tillers which suggest that plant ventrical heights within stands influenced borer attacks. Sorghum shootfly was restricted to within 42 DAG and very much regulated by intercropping. Maruca testulalis attack on cowpea plants was confined between 30 through 60 DAG of cowpeas. Presence or absence of non-preferred cereal hosts within the cropping patterns did not seem to interfere with the M. testulalis colonisation and establishment processes within the cropping patterns. Pod damages resulting from Maruca attack were however influenced by the cropping patterns with mixed maize–cowpea–sorghum intercrop, producing significantly higher healthier pods. The paper concludes that some intercropping patterns have many advantages over monocropping patterns with respect to pest colonisation and establishment.

Keywords

Intercroppingfarming systemscropping patternsstem-borerspod-borersmaizecowpeasorghumChilo partellusMaruca testulalisAtherigona soccataSesamia calamistisBusseola fuscaHeliothis armigera
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 4 , Special Issue 1-2: Crop-Borers and Emerging Strategies for their Control , June 1983 , pp. 47 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altieri, M. A., Francis, C. A., Van Schoonhoven, A. and Doll, J. D. (1978) A review of insect prevalence in maize (Zea Mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) polycultural systems. Field Crop Res. 1, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon (1978) Farming Systems Research at the International Agricultural Research Centres. World Bank, Washington D.C.66 pp.Google Scholar
Anon (1981) Pest Control in Tropical Grain Legumes. C.O.P.R. London, 206 pp.Google Scholar
Atkins, C. A. (1982) Nitrogen fixation potentials for improvement in legumes. In Induced Mutations for Improvement of Grain legume Production. II. 60, pp. 147–168. IAEA-TECDOC.Google Scholar
Coaker, T. H. (1956) An experiment on stem-borer control on maize. E. Afr. Agric. J. 21, 220–221.Google Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1960) Studies on intercropping: I. Maize and sorghum with groundnuts. E. Afr. Agric. Fo. J. 26, 1–10.Google Scholar
Haizel, K. A. (1974) The agronomic significance of mixed cropping. I. Maize interplanted with cowpea. Ghana Inl. Agric. Sci. 7, 169–178.Google Scholar
Hill, D. S. (1975) Agricultural Insect Pests of the Tropics and their Control. Cambridge University Press. London, 516 pp.Google Scholar
Huffaker, C. B. (1962) Some concepts on the ecological basis of biological control of weeds. Can. Ent. 94, 507–514.Google Scholar
Ingram, W. R. (1958) The lepidopterous stalk-borers associated with Gramineae in Uganda. Bull. ent. Res. 49, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. (1973) Tropical agroecosystems. Science 182, 1212–1219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, C. J. (1969) Migration and Dispersal of Insects by Flight. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. Y. (1956) Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 12, 307–310.Google Scholar
Norman, D. W. (1974) Rationalising mixed cropping under indigenous conditions. The example of Northern Nigeria. J. Dev. Stud. 11, 3–21.Google Scholar
Nye, I. W. B. (1960) The insect pests of graminaceous crops in East Africa. Colon. Res. Stud. No. 31, H.M.S.O., London. 48 pp.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1977) The emergence of ecology as a new intergrative discipline. Science 195, 1289–1293.Google Scholar
Perrin, R. M. (1977) Pest management in multiple cropping systems. Agroecosystems 3, 93–118.Google Scholar
Perrin, R. M. and Phillips, M. L. (1978) Some effects of mixed cropping on the population dynamics of insect pests. Ent. expt. Appl. 24, 385–393.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. (1961) The influence of plant spatial patterns on insect populations. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risch, S. (1980) The population dynamics of several herbivorous beetles in tropical agroecosystem: the effect of intercropping corn, beans, and squash in Costa Rica. J. Appl. Ecol. 17, 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruthenberg, H. (1976) Fanning Systems in the Tropics. (1st edition) Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R., Taylor, T. A. and Van Emden, H. F. (1978) Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control. Academic Press, London, 454 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, J. G. (1976) Influence of crop background on aphids and other phytophagous insects on Brussels sprouts. Ann. Appl. Biol. 83, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. and Way, M. J. (1970) Ecological background to pest management. In Concepts of Pest Management (Edited by Rabb, R. L. and Guthrie, F. E.), pp. 6–28. N.C. State Univ., Raleigh.Google Scholar
Tahvanainen, J. O. and Root, R. B. (1972) The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotsela crucifera (Colcoptera: Chrysomelidae) Oeeologia 10, 312–346.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. A. (1978) Maruca testulalis: An important pest of tropical grain legumes. In Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control. (Edited by Singh, S. R., Taylor, T. A. and Van Emden, H. F.) pp. 193–200. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, S. (1976) The agroecosystem: a simplified plant community. In Integrated Pest Management. (Edited by Apple, J. L. and Smith, R. F.) pp. 59–70. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wiley, R. W. and Osiru, D. S. O. (1972) Studies on mixtures London. of maize and beans (Phaseolus vutgaris) with particular reference to plant population. J. Agric. Sci. 79, 517–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wit, C. T. de (1960) On competition. Verse. Lundbouwk. Onderz. Wageningen N.R. 688.Google Scholar