Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:54:53.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host preference by the twig borer Xylosandrus compactus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and simulated influence of shade trees on its populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2017

James Peter Egonyu ,
John Baguma ,
Isaac Ogari ,
Gladys Ahumuza  and
Gerald Ddumba
James Peter Egonyu*
Affiliation:
National Coffee Research Institute, Mukono, Uganda, PO Box 185, Mukono, Uganda
John Baguma
Affiliation:
National Coffee Research Institute, Mukono, Uganda, PO Box 185, Mukono, Uganda
Gladys Ahumuza
Affiliation:
National Coffee Research Institute, Mukono, Uganda, PO Box 185, Mukono, Uganda
Gerald Ddumba
Affiliation:
National Coffee Research Institute, Mukono, Uganda, PO Box 185, Mukono, Uganda
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Xylosandrus compactus (Eichhoff) is a serious pest of Coffea canephora and Theobroma cacao in Uganda and also attacks several common shade tree species often associated with these crops. Seedlings of 10 common hosts of X. compactus were screened for preferential infestation by X. compactus, with a view to analysing the potential role of the shade trees in escalating incidence and damage by the pest. The experiment was conducted for 8 weeks in a garden of mature C. canephora infested by X. compactus that served as a natural source of infestation for the seedlings. The seedlings that became infested by X. compactus were counted weekly and the counts subjected to generalized linear modelling. Results show marked host preference by X. compactus, with T. cacao and C. canephora being the most preferred, while Eucalyptus sp. and Albizia chinensis being the least preferred. Four simulated scenarios of incidence and damage by X. compactus on a preferred crop such as C. canephora are discussed. It is suggested that it is most unlikely for unpreferred alternate host shade tree species to markedly increase populations of X. compactus on shaded preferred host plants. However, these simulations, which are based on results from potted seedlings, need to be validated in a real field situation, taking into account other ecological parameters that are likely to influence pest populations.

Keywords

Alternate hostshost preferenceAlbizia chinensisCoffea canephoraTheobroma cacao
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 183 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © icipe 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present address: College of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, PO Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda

References

Albertin, A. and Nair, P. K. R. (2004) Farmers' perspectives on the role of shade trees in coffee production systems: An assessment from the Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. Human Ecology 32, 443–463.Google Scholar
Armbrecht, I. and Gallego, M. C. (2007) Testing ant predation on the coffee berry borer in shaded and sun coffee plantations in Colombia. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 124, 261–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007.00574.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, J. (1988) Litter production and nutrient cycling in coffee (Coffea arabica) or cacao (Theobroma cacao) plantations with shade trees. Agroforestry Systems 7, 103–114.Google Scholar
Bisseleua, D., Missoup, A. and Vidal, S. (2009) Biodiversity conservation, ecosystem functioning, and economic incentives under cocoa agroforestry intensification. Conservation Biology 23, 1176–1184. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01220.x.Google Scholar
Bonello, P., Mcnee, W. R., Storer, A. J., Wood, D. L. and Gordon, T. R. (2001) The role of olfactory stimuli in the location of weakened hosts by twig-infesting Pityophthorus spp. Ecological Entomology 26, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J. A. (1996) An encounter rate model of bark beetle populations searching at random for susceptible host trees. Ecological Modelling 91, 57–66.Google Scholar
CABI (2015) Invasive species compendium: Xylosandrus compactus (shot-hole borer). Available at: http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/57234 [Accessed 1 November 2015].Google Scholar
DaMatta, F. M. (2004) Ecophysiological constraints on the production of shaded and unshaded coffee: a review. Field Crops Research 86, 99–114.Google Scholar
Egonyu, J. P., Kucel, P., Kangire, A., Sewaya, F. and Nkugwa, C. (2009) Impact of the black twig borer on robusta coffee in Mukono and Kayunga districts, central Uganda. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 3, 163– 169.Google Scholar
Egonyu, J. P., Ahumuza, G. and Ogari, I. (2016) Population dynamics of Xylosandrus compactus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) on Coffea canephora in Uganda. African Zoology 51, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erasmus, M. J. and Chown, S. L. (1994) Host location and aggregation behaviour in Hylastes angustatus (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). African Entomology 2, 7–11.Google Scholar
Gries, G., Nolte, R. and Sanders, W. (1989) Computer simulated host selection in Ips typographus . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 53, 211–217.Google Scholar
Herzog, F. (1994) Multipurpose shade trees in coffee and cocoa plantations in Côte d'Ivoire. Agroforestry Systems 27, 259–267.Google Scholar
Kagezi, G., Kucel, P., Egonyu, J., Kyamanywa, S., Karungi, J., Pinard, F., Jaramillo, J., van Asten, P., Wagoire, W. and Ngabirano, H. (2014a) A review of the status and progress in management research of the black coffee twig borer, Xylosandrus compactus (Eichhoff) in Uganda. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Coffee Science—Coffee Agronomy & Biotechnologies (ASIC 2014). Association for Science and Information on Coffee (ASIC), Bussigny, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kagezi, G., Kucel, P., Mukasa, D., van Asten, P., Musoli, P. C. and Kangire, A. (2013) Preliminary report on the status and host plant utilization by the black coffee twig borer, Xylosandrus compactus (Eichhoff) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Uganda, p. 1323. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Coffee Science—Coffee Agronomy & Biotechnologies (ASIC 2014). Association for Science and Information on Coffee (ASIC), Bussigny, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kagezi, G. H., Kucel, P., Egonyu, J. P., Ahumuza, G., Nakibuule, L., Kobusingye, J. and Wagoire, W. (2014b) Implications of black coffee twig borer on cocoa in Uganda. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences 15, 179–189.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, K. and Maloney, L. T. (2012) Modeling Psychophysical Data in R. Springer, New York, USA. 375 pp.Google Scholar
Ngoan, N. D., Wilkinson, R. C., Short, D. E., Moses, C. S. and Mangold, J. R. (1976) Biology of an introduced ambrosia beetle, Xylosandrus compactus, in Florida. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 69, 872–876.Google Scholar
Peeters, L. Y. K., Soto-Pinto, L., Perales, H., Montoya, G. and Ishiki, M. (2003) Coffee production, timber, and firewood in traditional and Inga-shaded plantations in Southern Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 95, 481–493.Google Scholar
Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J. H., Bautista, G. L., Nunñez, G. I., Greenberg, R., Bichier, P. and Langridge, S. (2004) Greater predation in shaded coffee farms: the role of resident Neotropical birds. Ecology 85, 2677–2681. doi: 10.1890/03-3145.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/ [Accessed 20 November 2014].Google Scholar
Rice, R. A. and Ward, J. R. (1996) Coffee, conservation, and commerce in the Western Hemisphere. The Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center and the Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC. Available at: ftp://187.188.248.142/Texto/CONSERVACI%D3N/COFFEE,%20CONSERVATION,%20AND%20COMMERCE%20IN%20THE%20WESTERN%20HEMISPHERE.pdf [Accessed 14 October 2015].Google Scholar
Ruf, F. and Schroth, G. (2004) Chocolate forests and monocultures: a historical review of cocoa growing and its conflicting role in tropical deforestation and forest conservation, pp. 107–134. In Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes (edited by Schroth, G., da Fonseca, A. B., Harvey, C. A., Gascon, C., Vasconcelos, H. L. and Izac, A. N.). Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia.Google Scholar
Schroth, G., Krauss, U., Gasparotto, L., Duarte Aguilar, J. A. and Vohland, K. (2000) Pests and diseases in agroforestry systems of the humid tropics. Agroforestry Systems 50, 199–241.Google Scholar
Somarriba, E., Harvey, C. A., Samper, M., Anthony, F., González, J., Staver, C. and Rice, R. A. (2004) Biodiversity conservation in Neotropical coffee (Coffea arabica) plantations, pp. 198–226. In Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes (edited by Schroth, G., da Fonseca, A. B., Harvey, C. A., Gascon, C., Vasconcelos, H. L. and Izac, A. N.). Island Press, Washington, District of Columbia.Google Scholar
Staver, C., Guharay, F., Monterroso, D. and Muschler, R. G. (2001) Designing pest-suppressive multistrata perennial crop systems: shade-grown coffee in Central America. Agroforestry Systems 53, 151–170.Google Scholar
Zhang, P. J., Liu, S. S., Wang, H. and Zalucki, M. P. (2007) The influence of early adult experience and larval food restriction on responses toward nonhost plants in moths. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33, 1528– 1541.Google Scholar
Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. and Smith, G. M. (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York. 574 pp.Google Scholar