Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:59:39.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The distribution of the eggs of the sorghum shootfly, Atherigona soccata Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Alex G. L. Delobel
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Field and laboratory observations revealed that the placement of eggs of the sorghum shootfly, Atherigona soccata, among sorghum stems tended to be random or slightly aggregated rather than regular, which suggests that the site of oviposition by a female is little or not determined by the presence of other eggs already laid. The possible effects of this type of distribution on the mortality of the first-instar larvae are briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anscombe, F. J. (1949) The statistical analysis of insect counts based on the Negative Binomial distribution. Biometrics 5, 165173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbogast, R. T. and Mullen, M. A. (1978) Spatial distribution of eggs by ovipositing Indian meal moths, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 19, 148154.Google Scholar
Bardner, R. and Lofty, J. (1971) The distribution of eggs, larvae and plants within crop attacked by wheat-bulb fly Leptohyiemyia coarctata (Fall.). J. appi. Ecol. 8, 683686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, C. I. and Fisher, R. A. (1953) Fitting the Negative Binomial distribution to biological data with a note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics 9, 176200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeflinoer, E. (1953) Das Auswahlvermögen der Kirschenfliege bei der Eiablage (eine statistiche Studie). Min. Schweiz. ent. Ges. 26, 258264.Google Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. (1961) Spatial pattern of the imported cabbage-worm, Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on cultivated Cruciferae. Can. Ent. 43, 945952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsoyannos, B. I. (1975) Oviposition-deterring, male arresting, fruit-marking pheromone in Rhagoletis cerasi. Envir. Ent. 4, 801807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempthorne, O. (1973) The Design and Analysis of Experiments. Knege, Huntington, New York.Google Scholar
Lamotie, M. (1957) Initiation aux Méthodes Statistiques en Biologie. Masson & Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
Martin, H. (1948) Observations biologiques et essais de traitement contre la mouche de l'olive (Dacus oleae Rossi) dans la province de Terragone (Espagne) de 1946 à 1948. Mitt Schweiz ent. Ges. 21, 361402.Google Scholar
Morisita, M. (1962) Iδ-index, a measure of dispersion of individuals. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto. Univ. 4, 17.Google Scholar
Morisita, M. (1964) Application of Iδ-index to sampling techniques. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 6, 4353.Google Scholar
Ogwaro, K. (1978) Ovipositional behaviour and host-plant preference of the sorghum shoot fly, Atherigona seccata (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Entomologia exp. appi. 23, 189199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieters, E. P. and Sterling, W. L. (1974) Aggregation indices of cotton anthropods in Texas. Envir. Ent. 3, 598600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, G. (1969) The ecology of a natural population of the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni—II. The distribution of eggs and its relation to behaviour. Aust. J. Zool. 17, 293311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. (1972) Evidence for a marking pheromone deterring repeated oviposition in apple maggot flies. Envir. Em. 1, 326332.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. (1975) Oviposition-deterring fruit-marking pheromone in Rhagoletis fausta. Envir. Ent. 4, 298300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raina, A. K. (1981) Deterrence of repeated oviposition in sorghum shootfly, Atherigona soccata. J. chem. Ecol (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. (1966) Ecological Methods. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, Land. 189, 732735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadley, F. M. (1950) Notes on the form of distribution of insect and plant populations. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 43, 581586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, W. E. (1959) A quantitative measure of aggregation in insects. J. econ. Ent. 52, 11801184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar