Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:31:28.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of suitable sampling methods for the arthropods of four mint species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Dwijendra Singh
Dwijendra Singh
Affiliation:
Entomology Division, Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, P.O. CIMAP, Lucknow-226015, India
Get access

Abstract

In order to develop suitable sampling methods for the arthropods of four mint species, namely Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L.- var. Hybrid 77), peppermint (M. piperitaL.-var. MP-1), bergamot mint (M. citrata Ehrhrt- var. Kiran) and spearmint (M. spicata L.- var. MSS-5), six general sampling methods viz. ground cloth, sticker, sweep net, water trap, whole plant observation (WPO) and whole plant harvest (WPH) were evaluated under field conditions at the Research Farm of Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow, India. The mint pest complex on all the mint species included Aphis craccivora, Chrotogonus trachypterus, Leptocorisa varicornis, Coccinella septempunctata, Bemisia tabaci, an unidentified lygeid bug, Brumoides suturalis, Propylea dissecta, Crysolina exanthematica, Dysdercus cingulatus and Plusia orichalcea. Overall, the ground cloth, sweep net, water trap and sticker methods were found to be more efficient and successful for sampling the arthropods of mint crops than the WPO and WPH methods. The shortest sampling time was required when using the sticker (3–6 seconds per sweep) and the sweep net (7–8 seconds per sweep) methods. This information may be useful in developing an integrated pest management programme for mint.

Résumé

En vue de mettre au point des méthodes d'échantionnage appropriées pour les arthropodes de quatre espèces de menthes à savoir, la menthe japonaise (Mentha arvensis L-var. Hybride 77), la menthe poivrée (M. piperita L. - var. MP-1), la menthe bergamote (M. citrata Ehrhrt-var. Kiran) et la menthe à épi (M. spicata L.-var. MSS-5), six méthodes d'échantillonnage générales, en l'occurrence le drap au sol, le collant, le filet à balayage, le piège à eau, l'observation de la plante entière (OPE) ainsi que la récolte de la plante entière (RPE) furent évaluées dans des conditions du terrain à la Ferme de Recherche de l'Institut Central des Plantes Médicinales et Aromatiques de Lucknow en Inde. Le complexe de ravageurs de menthe trouvés sur toutes les espèces comprenait Aphis craccivora, Chrotogonus trachypterus, Leptocorisa varicornis, Coccinella septempunctata, Bemisia tabaci, une cochenille lygéide non identifiée, Brumoides saturalis, Propylea dissecta, Crysolina exanthematica, Dysdercus cingulatus et Plusia orichalcea. Dans l'ensemble, le drap au sol, le filet à balayage, le piège à eau et le collant se révélèrent plus efficients et plus fructueux dans l'échantillonnage des arthropodes que les méthodes OPE et RPE. Le collant et le filet à balayage prirent le plus court temps d'échantillonnage, soit 3 à 6 secondes et 7 à 8 secondes par prise, respectivement. Cette information scientifique peut étre utile dans la mise au point d'un programme de lutte intégrée centre les ravageurs des cultures de menthe.

Keywords

mintMentha arvensisMentha citrataMentha piperitaMentha spicatapest complexpredatorsampling methodsmentheMentha arvensisMentha citrataMentha piperitaMentha spicatacomplexe de ravageursprédateurméthodes d'échantillonnage
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3-4 , December 1995 , pp. 333 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berry, R. E. and Shields, E. J. (1980) Variegated cutworm: Leaf consumption and economic loss in peppermint. J. Econ. Entomol. 73, 607–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, J. P. S. and Gulati, B. C. (1969) Record of Syngamia abruptalis Heck. on Japanese mint in Tarai area. India Perf. 11, 202.Google Scholar
Danielson, S. D. and Berry, R. E. (1978) Red backed cutworm: Sequential sampling plans in peppermint. J. Econ. Entomol. 71, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, E. G. (1960) Problems in the control of mint insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 53, 526–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, M. and Herzog, D. C. (1980) Sampling Methods in Soyabean Entomology. Springer-Verlag Publications, New York. 587 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liljesthron, G. and Bernstein, C. (1990) Density dependence and regulation in the system Nezara viridula (L) host and Trichopoda giacomellii (Blanchard) (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitoid. Oecologia 84, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, N. V., Reddy, A. S., Rao, B. R. and Satyanarayana, G. (1991) Interplant distribution of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Genn. on cotton, Gossypium hirsutum Linn. J. Insect Sci. 4, 32–36.Google Scholar
Sandhu, G. S., Singh, B. and Bhalla, J. S. (1975) Insect pests of Japanese mint in India. Indian Perfumer 21, 13–18.Google Scholar
Shepard, M., Carner, G. R. and Tunipseed, S. G. (1974) A comparison of three sampling methods for arthropods in soyabean. Environmental Entomology 3, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D. (1990) Japani podine par Lagne wale Keet Avam Unke Niyantran ki Sambhavanayen, pp. 34–35. Abstr Nat. Symp. on Paryavaran Pradushan Rahit Keet Niyantran. National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India.Google Scholar
Singh, D. and Bali, R. (1993) New record of coccinellid predators on aphids (Aphis affinis and Myzus persicae) in Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis sub sp haplocalyx var piperascens) and egyptian henbane (Hyoscyamus muticus). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 63, 313–314.Google Scholar
Velasco, L. R. J. and Walter, G. H. (1992) Availability of different host plant species and changing abundance of the polyphagous pest Nezara viridula. Environmental Entomology 21, 751–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar