Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:52:18.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A computer-simulated model for the biology and control of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann (Acari: Ixodidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

S. Nokoe ,
H. Meena ,
D. Munyinyi ,
D. K. Punyua ,
A. A. Latif  and
O. Okello
S. Nokoe
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
H. Meena
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
D. Munyinyi
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
D. K. Punyua
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
A. A. Latif
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
O. Okello
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Progress in the development of a simple life cycle model, with both deterministic and stochastic components for the brown ear tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neuman (Acarina: Ixodidae), is described. Control strategies or interventions that are user-manipulated are incorporated.

The model is initially applicable to Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya, where parasitic phase data have been accumulated for a 30-months' period, but could be used for any other R. appendiculatus locations.

Résumé

Le progrès dans le dévéloppement d'une vie- cycle sample d'un modèle, avec les components deterministiques et stochastiques pour le tique avec l'oreille brunne, le Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neuman (Acarina: Ixodidae) est bien décrit. Les strategies de contrôle ou les interventions qui sont utilisées sont aussi inclus. Le modèle a été initialment appliqué à l'île de Rusinga, L. Victoria, Kenya, mais il a la capabilité d'être utilisé pour des autres locations de Rhipicephalus appendiculatus.

Keywords

Computer-simulated modelcontrol strategiesRhipicephalus appendiculatusticksRusinga Island
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 69 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Branagan, D. (1973) Observations on the development and survival of the Ixodid tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Neumann 1901) under quasi-natural conditions in Kenya. Trop. Anim. Hlth Prod. 5, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gettinby, G., Newson, R. M., Calpin, M. M. J. and Patten, G. (1988) A simulation model for genetic resistance to acaricides in the African brown ear tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Acarina: Ixodidae). Prev. Vet. Med. 6, 183–197.Google Scholar
King, D., Gettinby, G. and Newson, R. M. (1988) A climate based model for the development of the ixodid tick, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus in East Coast Fever zones. Vet. Parasitol. 29, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latif, A. A., Nokoe, S., Punyua, D. K. and Capstick, P. B. (1991) East African Zebu cattle/tick relationships on Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya: Quantitative assessment of host-resistance. J. Med. Entomol. 28, 122–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latif, A. A., Punyua, D. K., Capstick, P. B. and Newson, R. M. (1991) East African Zebu cattle/tick relationships on Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya: Host-resistance to natural tick infestation. J. Med. Entomol. 28, 127–132.Google Scholar
Newson, R. M. and Mugane, J. (1987) Survival of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus on the ground. In Fifteenth Annual Report (1987), p. 44. ICIPE, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Nokoe, S., Latif, A. A., Capstick, P. B. and Punyua, D. K. (1988) Quantifying the level of resistance in cattle to Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Acarina: Ixodidae) using a multivariate analytical procedure. Paper presented at Biomathematics Workshop, 4–8 September, 1988 Ibadan, Nigeria. University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Osburn, R. L. and Knipling, E. F. (1982) The potential use of sterile hybrid Boophilus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) as a supplemental eradication technique. J. Med. Entomol. 19, 637–644.Google Scholar
Patten, B. C. (1971) Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sutherst, R. W., Dallwitz, M. J., Utech, K. B. N and Kerr, J. D. (1978) Aspects of host finding by the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Aust. J. Zool. 26, 159–174.Google Scholar
Sutherst, R. W. and Dallwitz, M. J. (1979) Progress in the development of a population model for the cattle tick Boophilus microplus. In Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Acarol. (1974). Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, pp. 557–563.Google Scholar
Weidhaas, D. E., Haile, D.G., George, J. E., Osburn, R. L. and Drummond, R. O. (1983) A basic model for use in computer simulations of Boophilus tick biology and control. USDA. Advances in Agricultural Technology No. 32, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Wishetemi, B. (1989) Induction of immunity in sheep to Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Neumann, 1901) antigens. Ph.D thesis, Kenyatta University, Kenya.Google Scholar